Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model

From: Max Tsai Date: July 30, 2006 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Tsai, Max" max.tsai@spcorp.com Subject: Re: [NMusers] Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:23:43 -0400 Nick, Let me provide some additional details for clarity. I often encounter floating point error messages for which no final parameter estimates are provided in the output for comparisons. Comparing the gradients of the two separate runs using the same initial estimates, both seem to travel the same path initially. After 10-20 iterations, the paths diverge where one run appears to reach a minima and the other run encounters problems with numerical integration. In attempts to "guide" the model in the right direction, I used the final estimates of the successful run as initial estimates for the run on the troublesome compiler without any luck (same floating point error). If parameter estimates are reasonable and model performance (predictive check) seems adequate for this model, would you still use this model as a basis for simulations, even though it does not run consistently? -Max Max Tsai, Ph.D. Associate Principal Scientist (DMPK) Schering-Plough Corporation 2015 Galloping Hill Road K-15-2-2650 Kenilworth, NJ 07033-0530 (: (908) 740-3911 : (908) 740-2916 *: max.tsai@spcorp.com
Jul 29, 2006 Max Tsai Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Jul 30, 2006 Nick Holford Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Jul 30, 2006 Max Tsai Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Jul 30, 2006 Leonid Gibiansky Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Jul 30, 2006 Nick Holford Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Jul 31, 2006 Max Tsai Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Jul 31, 2006 Peter Bonate Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Jul 31, 2006 Peter Bonate Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Aug 01, 2006 Mark Sale Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Aug 01, 2006 Nick Holford Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Aug 02, 2006 Leonid Gibiansky Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Aug 02, 2006 Nick Holford Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Aug 02, 2006 Mark Sale Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Aug 02, 2006 Leonid Gibiansky Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Aug 02, 2006 Mark Sale Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Aug 03, 2006 Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Aug 03, 2006 Nick Holford Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Aug 03, 2006 James G Wright Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Aug 03, 2006 Manoj Khurana Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Aug 03, 2006 Mark Sale Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model
Aug 03, 2006 Nick Holford Re: Problems with an apparent compiler-senstive model