RE: Non-physiological parameters at lowest OBJ

From: Rik Shoemaker <RS@chdr.nl> Subject: RE: [NMusers] Non-physiological parameters at lowest OBJ Date: 8/7/2003 2:50 AM Dear all, This solution for dealing with flip-flops is bound to work well, but is no one bothered by the fact that neither Ka nor its variability is ever estimated? Absorption half-life seems to me a parameter you'd want to report, not some compound parameter... Rik _______________________________________________________ For continuation of this discussion and related issues, refer to 99aug072003.html