RE: Non-physiological parameters at lowest OBJ
From: Leonid Gibiansky <lgibiansky@emmes.com>
Subject: RE: [NMusers] Non-physiological parameters at lowest OBJ
Date: 8/6/2003 10:34 AM
Vladimir,
I do not know any better way, and use it as well, but KE=KA+THETA(3)*EXP(ETA(3))
looks unsatisfactory, because this representation imposes strong correlation
between KE and KA. Is there any better way to insure individual KA / KE relationship?
We may use full OMEGA (1-3) matrix to compensate for the imposed correlation. EXIT
statement looks better, have you compared the results of two approaches (EXIT vs sum)?
Thanks,
Leonid