RE: Non-physiological parameters at lowest OBJ

From: Justin Wilkins <jwilkins@uctgsh1.uct.ac.za> Subject: RE: [NMusers] Non-physiological parameters at lowest OBJ Date: 8/5/2003 10:14 AM Dear Bill and Diane, Thanks for the quick response! All the diagnostics look great and the fit is good with well-predicted individual curves at the higher objective function. Variances are also quite acceptable. The advice you've given supports my gut feeling - it's good to get some outside feedback though! What could account for this kind of thing? Justin