RE: Simultaneous drug and metabolite POPPK

From: Serge Guzy Date: February 13, 2007 technical Source: mail-archive.com
I just performed this kind of population analysis (with pdx-MC-PEM , not NONMEM) and there was no problem. In fact I never changed the units that were in ng/ml for both the drug parent and 7 metabolites. I think (I can be wrong of course) that the model parameters take care of everything automatically. The model parameters will have the units that include the conversion needed (from ng to nanmoles). Serge Guzy President, CEO; POP-PHARM, Inc. _____
Quoted reply history
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Xiao, Alan Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 6:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nmusers (E-mail); [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NMusers] Simultaneous drug and metabolite POPPK I think the easiest and least confusing way is to transform all concentrations into molar units in your data sets at the beginning when you model parent and metabolites simultaneously. However, there are other options to go around this issue. For example, you can also incorporate molecular weights into your model if you have to use weight concentrations in your data set for some reason. Alan -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 9:02 AM To: Nmusers (E-mail); [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NMusers] Simultaneous drug and metabolite POPPK I have a question for those who submitted these two examples - Did you transform the data into micromolar quantities? It is not clear from the examples. I have not done much parent/metabolite modeling (just lucky I guess) but it seems to me that one would have to work in molar units for these models to be valid. Can someone comment on this? Mike ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Michael J. Fossler, Pharm. D., Ph. D., F.C.P. Director Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Modeling & Simulation GlaxoSmithKline (610) 270 - 4797 FAX: (610) 270-5962 Cell: (443) 350-1194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- The information contained in this email message may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any transmission error. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, please immediately delete the e-mail and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender either by telephone or return e-mail. Any direct or indirect use, disclosure, distribution, printing, or copying of any part of this message is prohibited. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the views of XOMA.
Feb 12, 2007 Vijay V. Upreti Simultaneous drug and metabolite POPPK
Feb 13, 2007 Johan Rosenborg RE: Simultaneous drug and metabolite POPPK
Feb 13, 2007 Urien RE: Simultaneous drug and metabolite POPPK
Feb 13, 2007 Michael Fossler RE: Simultaneous drug and metabolite POPPK
Feb 13, 2007 Alan Xiao RE: Simultaneous drug and metabolite POPPK
Feb 13, 2007 Liping Zhang Re: Simultaneous drug and metabolite POPPK
Feb 13, 2007 Jun Shi RE: Simultaneous drug and metabolite POPPK
Feb 13, 2007 Stockis Armel RE: Simultaneous drug and metabolite POPPK
Feb 13, 2007 Serge Guzy RE: Simultaneous drug and metabolite POPPK
Feb 14, 2007 Jun Shi RE: Simultaneous drug and metabolite POPPK
Feb 14, 2007 Michael Fossler RE: Simultaneous drug and metabolite POPPK
Feb 14, 2007 Alan Xiao RE: Simultaneous drug and metabolite POPPK