Indirect response PD model

From: Max Tsai Date: January 28, 2005 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Tsai, Max" max.tsai@spcorp.com Subject: [NMusers] Indirect response PD model Date: Fri, January 28, 2005 4:38 pm Hello. I am rather new at modeling with NONMEM. As a learning opportunity, I'm trying to verify the results of a model that I ran successfully using WinNonMix. I have a set of PD data (shown below). The PK data has already been modeled and the PK parameters are fixed in the control stream (shown below). The PD model is an indirect response model with inhibition of production. When I run the model, it goes through many, many iterations before it fails. I have tried many different things such as changing initial estimates and altering error structures, but I come across the same errors: either there are rounding errors or r matrix is algorithmically singular and non-positive definite. I'm sure that the model can fit the data unless the algorithms for the two programs are that different (has anyone ever seen one program converge, but not the other?) If anyone could shed some light on this issue, it would be much appreciated. -Max $PROB PK-PD DATA $INPUT ID AMT TIME DV CMT $DATA CXCRPD.csv $SUBROUTINE ADVAN6 TOL=3 $MODEL NCOMP = 4 COMP = (GUT) COMP = (CENTRAL) COMP = (PERIPH) COMP = (EFFECT) $PK ;PK MODEL V = 216 KA = 2.35 K20 = 0.55 K23 = 0.17 K32 = 0.074 S2 = V/1000 ;PD MODEL TVKIN = THETA(1) TVKOUT = THETA(2) TVIC50 = THETA(3) KIN = TVKIN * EXP(ETA(1)) KOUT = TVKOUT * EXP(ETA(2)) IC50 = TVIC50 * EXP(ETA(3)) $DES DADT(1) = -KA * A(1) DADT(2) = (KA * A(1)) - ((K20 + K23) * A(2)) + (K32 * A(3)) DADT(3) = K23 * A(2) - K32 * A(3) CP = A(2)/S2 COEF = 1 - (CP / (IC50 + CP)) DADT(4) = KIN * COEF - KOUT * A(4) $THETA (0, 15); KIN (0, 0.15); KOUT (0, 5); IC50 $OMEGA 0.1; KIN 0.1; KOUT 0.1; IC50 $ERROR Y = F + EPS(1) $SIGMA 0.1 $EST MAXEVAL=5000 PRINT=1 $COV $SCAT (RES WRES) VS TIME Partial data set ID AMT TIME DV CMT 101 10 0 . 1 101 . 0 6.4 4 101 . 2 5.7 4 101 . 4 4.9 4 101 . 6 3.8 4 101 . 8 3.5 4 101 . 12 2.2 4 101 . 24 2.4 4 102 10 0 . 1 102 . 0 3.566667 4 102 . 2 3 4 102 . 4 2.4 4 102 . 6 1.6 4 102 . 8 1.8 4 102 . 12 2.4 4 102 . 24 2.9 4 104 10 0 . 1 104 . 0 2.666667 4 104 . 2 2.2 4 104 . 4 1.6 4 104 . 6 1.4 4 104 . 8 1.4 4 104 . 12 2 4 104 . 24 2.3 4 Max Tsai, Ph.D. Senior Scientist (DM/PK) Schering-Plough Corporation 2015 Galloping Hill Road K-15-2-2650 Kenilworth, NJ 07033-0530 (: (908) 740-3911 : (908) 740-2916 *: max.tsai@spcorp.com
Jan 28, 2005 Max Tsai Indirect response PD model
Jan 28, 2005 Sam Liao Re: Indirect response PD model
Jan 28, 2005 Mathangi Re: Indirect response PD model
Jan 31, 2005 Max Tsai RE: Indirect response PD model
Jan 31, 2005 Sam Liao Re: Indirect response PD model
Jan 31, 2005 Manoj Khurana Re: Indirect response PD model
Jan 31, 2005 Sam Liao Re: Indirect response PD model
Feb 01, 2005 Amol Tendolkar RE: Indirect response PD model
Feb 01, 2005 Max Tsai RE: Indirect response PD model
Feb 01, 2005 Sam Liao Re: Indirect response PD model