RE: Indirect response PD model

From: Max Tsai Date: February 01, 2005 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Tsai, Max" max.tsai@spcorp.com Subject: RE: [NMusers] Indirect response PD model Date: Tue, February 1, 2005 12:59 pm I agree that the 4 compartment setup is not necessary if the plasma concentrations from the PK model are entered into the dataset and the control stream is coded properly. However, I thought that since there is no mass actually being transferred to the effect compartment in the indirect response model, there is no need for a rate constant such as k1e to link the effect compartment and the central compartment, in my case. If anyone else in the users group would like to comment on this issue, please feel free. -Max
Jan 28, 2005 Max Tsai Indirect response PD model
Jan 28, 2005 Sam Liao Re: Indirect response PD model
Jan 28, 2005 Mathangi Re: Indirect response PD model
Jan 31, 2005 Max Tsai RE: Indirect response PD model
Jan 31, 2005 Sam Liao Re: Indirect response PD model
Jan 31, 2005 Manoj Khurana Re: Indirect response PD model
Jan 31, 2005 Sam Liao Re: Indirect response PD model
Feb 01, 2005 Amol Tendolkar RE: Indirect response PD model
Feb 01, 2005 Max Tsai RE: Indirect response PD model
Feb 01, 2005 Sam Liao Re: Indirect response PD model