RE: posthoc step

From: Thomas Ludden Date: December 16, 2004 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Ludden, Thomas (MYD)" luddent@iconus.com Subject: RE: [NMusers] posthoc step Date: Thu, December 16, 2004 4:14 pm Nick, I believe there is just one ETA search algorithm in each version of NONMEM, but let me confirm by tracing a simple example. I will let you know what I find. The ETA search in recent versions of NONMEM VI beta (since about June, 2003) appears to be more stable than the one in NONMEM V. NONMEM VI beta does not appear to produce the "spikes" in OFV due to inappropriate ETA estimates that are sometimes seen with V. However, Jerry's example is a problem for both versions. Tom
Dec 06, 2004 Pravin Jadhav posthoc step
Dec 06, 2004 Nitin Kaila Re: posthoc step
Dec 07, 2004 Pravin Jadhav Re: posthoc step
Dec 07, 2004 Nick Holford Re: posthoc step
Dec 07, 2004 William Bachman RE: posthoc step
Dec 07, 2004 Yaning Wang RE: posthoc step
Dec 07, 2004 Kenneth Kowalski RE: posthoc step
Dec 07, 2004 Marc Gastonguay Re: posthoc step
Dec 07, 2004 Jerry Nedelman RE: posthoc step
Dec 08, 2004 Pravin Jadhav Re: posthoc step
Dec 08, 2004 Leonid Gibiansky RE: posthoc step
Dec 08, 2004 Kenneth Kowalski RE: posthoc step
Dec 08, 2004 Nick Holford Re: posthoc step
Dec 08, 2004 Stephen Duffull RE: posthoc step
Dec 08, 2004 Stephen Duffull RE: posthoc step
Dec 08, 2004 Nick Holford Re: posthoc step
Dec 08, 2004 Jerry Nedelman RE: posthoc step
Dec 09, 2004 Yaning Wang RE: posthoc step
Dec 09, 2004 Nick Holford Re: posthoc step
Dec 10, 2004 Thomas Ludden RE: posthoc step
Dec 12, 2004 Jerry Nedelman RE: posthoc step
Dec 13, 2004 Thomas Ludden RE: posthoc step
Dec 14, 2004 Nick Holford Re: posthoc step
Dec 15, 2004 Stephen Duffull RE: posthoc step
Dec 15, 2004 Nick Holford Re: posthoc step
Dec 15, 2004 Stephen Duffull RE: posthoc step
Dec 15, 2004 Thomas Ludden RE: posthoc step
Dec 16, 2004 Vicente Casabo RE: posthoc step
Dec 16, 2004 Nick Holford Re: posthoc step
Dec 16, 2004 Thomas Ludden RE: posthoc step
Dec 20, 2004 Thomas Ludden RE: posthoc step