RE: Ka>Ke?

From: Serge Guzy Date: August 11, 2003 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: Serge Guzy <GUZY@xoma.com> Subject: RE: [NMusers] Ka>Ke? Date: 8/11/2003 12:44 PM If you would use simulations to test how your population PK software is working, flip-flop will cause a bias in the final population estimates you will obtain. The final population distribution will not be similar to the one you began with and will depend heavily on the initial estimates you begin with. Flip-flop can cause also your final population not to follow normality (or log-normality) and bimodality is common when not taking account for potential flip-flop. Constraints (not acceptance-rejection but rather the one proposed in this forum) are therefore necessary to remove dependence between initial estimates and final estimates and at the same time performing a valid population analysis. Serge _______________________________________________________
Aug 07, 2003 Yaning Wang TVKa>TVKe or Ka>Ke?
Aug 07, 2003 Kenneth Kowalski RE: TVKa>TVKe or Ka>Ke?
Aug 07, 2003 Chuanpu Hu RE: TVKa>TVKe or Ka>Ke?
Aug 07, 2003 Nick Holford Re: TVKa>TVKe or Ka>Ke?
Aug 07, 2003 Yaning Wang Re: TVKa>TVKe or Ka>Ke?
Aug 08, 2003 Justin Wilkins RE: TVKa>TVKe or Ka>Ke?
Aug 08, 2003 Kenneth Kowalski RE: TVKa>TVKe or Ka>Ke?
Aug 11, 2003 Rik Shoemaker Re: Ka>Ke?
Aug 11, 2003 Kenneth Kowalski RE: Ka>Ke?
Aug 11, 2003 Rik Shoemaker RE: Ka>Ke?
Aug 11, 2003 Serge Guzy RE: Ka>Ke?