RE: Ka>Ke?
From: Rik Shoemaker <RS@chdr.nl>
Subject: RE: [NMusers] Ka>Ke?
Date: 8/11/2003 8:58 AM
Ken,
Exactly! Which is why I would want the inequality to hold at both the
individual and the population level and not really allow individuals to
flip relative to the population estimates (as Justin Wilkins
suggested he required).
Rik