Re: Bayesian estimation: a specific case

From: Pierre Maitre Date: October 04, 2000 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: Pierre Maitre <maitre@cdg.ch> Subject: Re: Bayesian estimation: a specific case Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 21:29:05 +0200 Quyen.Ho-Nguyen@serono.com wrote: > > The question is: can I use the model of pop1 to calculate the Posthoc PK > (CL, V, etc...) of pop2? Sure, if 1) you believe that pop1 and pop2 are subgroups of the same population 2) the conditions and admistration scheme used in pop2 are not too different from thoses used in pop1 > Is it relevant to apply the PK model found in Pop1 to the Pop2, > even if data of Pop2 can not describe this model, due to a low > number of samples per patient in Pop2 and to the complicated PK model? Yes, that's exactly the purpose of Bayesian regression. Best regards Pierre Maitre
Sep 29, 2000 Quyen Ho Nguyen Bayesian estimation
Sep 29, 2000 Jogarao Gobburu Re: Bayesian estimation
Sep 29, 2000 Leonid Gibiansky RE: Bayesian estimation
Sep 29, 2000 平岡 聖樹 RE:Bayesian estimation
Sep 29, 2000 Vladimir Piotrovskij RE: Bayesian estimation
Sep 29, 2000 Lewis B. Sheiner Re: Bayesian estimation
Sep 29, 2000 Nick Holford Re: Bayesian estimation
Sep 30, 2000 Lewis B. Sheiner Re: Bayesian estimation
Sep 30, 2000 Stuart Beal Bayesian estimation
Oct 01, 2000 Stephen Duffull RE: Bayesian estimation
Oct 02, 2000 Jogarao Gobburu Bayesian Estimation
Oct 04, 2000 Quyen Ho Nguyen Bayesian estimation: a specific case
Oct 04, 2000 Jogarao Gobburu Re: Bayesian estimation: a specific case
Oct 04, 2000 Pierre Maitre Re: Bayesian estimation: a specific case
Oct 05, 2000 Mats Karlsson Re: Bayesian estimation: a specific case
Oct 05, 2000 Vladimir Piotrovskij RE: Bayesian estimation: a specific case
Oct 05, 2000 Quyen Ho Nguyen RE: Bayesian estimation: a specific case