Re: Bayesian estimation: a specific case

From: Jogarao Gobburu Date: October 04, 2000 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Jogarao Gobburu 301-594-5354 FAX 301-480-3212" <GOBBURUJ@cder.fda.gov> Subject: Re: Bayesian estimation: a specific case Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 09:09:31 -0400 (EDT) Hello, 1. I believe the suggestions offered earlier are valid ONLY if you do not have a priori expectations that PK-wise pop1 and pop2 are different. If you 'expect' that pop1,2 are different, your model is not complete. 2. Why not simply combine the 2 data sets and get the population parameters? Use a dummy variable to differentiate the two populations to start with, followed by a more mechanistic approach to explore 'relevant' prognostic factors (eg: variables reflecting renal/hepatic function etc..) Regards, Joga Gobburu Pharmacometrics, CDER, FDA.
Sep 29, 2000 Quyen Ho Nguyen Bayesian estimation
Sep 29, 2000 Jogarao Gobburu Re: Bayesian estimation
Sep 29, 2000 Leonid Gibiansky RE: Bayesian estimation
Sep 29, 2000 平岡 聖樹 RE:Bayesian estimation
Sep 29, 2000 Vladimir Piotrovskij RE: Bayesian estimation
Sep 29, 2000 Lewis B. Sheiner Re: Bayesian estimation
Sep 29, 2000 Nick Holford Re: Bayesian estimation
Sep 30, 2000 Lewis B. Sheiner Re: Bayesian estimation
Sep 30, 2000 Stuart Beal Bayesian estimation
Oct 01, 2000 Stephen Duffull RE: Bayesian estimation
Oct 02, 2000 Jogarao Gobburu Bayesian Estimation
Oct 04, 2000 Quyen Ho Nguyen Bayesian estimation: a specific case
Oct 04, 2000 Jogarao Gobburu Re: Bayesian estimation: a specific case
Oct 04, 2000 Pierre Maitre Re: Bayesian estimation: a specific case
Oct 05, 2000 Mats Karlsson Re: Bayesian estimation: a specific case
Oct 05, 2000 Vladimir Piotrovskij RE: Bayesian estimation: a specific case
Oct 05, 2000 Quyen Ho Nguyen RE: Bayesian estimation: a specific case