Re: Negative objective functions

From: Lewis B. Sheiner Date: October 30, 1998 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: LSheiner <lewis@c255.ucsf.edu> Subject: Re: Negative objective functions Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 14:28:56 -0800 Right. As the ELS obj fn has been defined, the "scale" I mentioned in my note is indeed as Ken gives it. I was simply making the point that a likelihood (of which the ELS obj fn is an example) is equal to a probability only up to a proportionality constant which may be a function of the data (as for ELS: N is a data-determined quantity). Likelihoods are defined for ML estimation, and an extremum of a function does not change when the scale of the function changes.
Oct 29, 1998 James Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Rik Schoemaker Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Stephen Duffull Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Rik Schoemaker Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 James Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Vladimir Piotrovskij RE: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Lewis B. Sheiner Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Kenneth G. Kowalski Re[2]: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Lewis B. Sheiner Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 31, 1998 James Re: Negative objective functions
Nov 01, 1998 James Re: Negative objective functions