Re: Negative objective functions

From: Rik Schoemaker Date: October 30, 1998 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Rik Schoemaker" <RS@chdr.nl> Subject: Re: Negative objective functions Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 10:28:29 +0100 Oops, Steve is right of course, it is MINUS twice the log likelihood and therefore the likelihood must be greater than 1. I've run into negative values very often and it seems to me they have no meaning on their own. Rik Schoemaker

Thread

View all 11 messages
Oct 29, 1998 James Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Rik Schoemaker Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Stephen Duffull Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Rik Schoemaker Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 James Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Vladimir Piotrovskij RE: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Lewis B. Sheiner Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Kenneth G. Kowalski Re[2]: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Lewis B. Sheiner Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 31, 1998 James Re: Negative objective functions
Nov 01, 1998 James Re: Negative objective functions
← Previous
Next →