Re: Negative objective functions

From: Lewis B. Sheiner Date: October 30, 1998 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: LSheiner <lewis@c255.ucsf.edu> Subject: Re: Negative objective functions Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 09:05:07 -0800 As I wrote in response to the original message (but didn't copy nmusers), the likelihood (L) is proportional to the probability of the data, but only proportional. It's scale is not fixed. Thus it can easily be greater than 1 and hence -2 log(L) < 0. A typical likelihood, in simple Normal problems is the sum of squares. This is typically N*(variance of residuals), where N is the number of observatikons. If N is large enough, or if the residual variance in the squared observation units of the dependent variable is >1, L will be >1 and -2log(L) <0. LBS.
Oct 29, 1998 James Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Rik Schoemaker Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Stephen Duffull Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Rik Schoemaker Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 James Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Vladimir Piotrovskij RE: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Lewis B. Sheiner Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Kenneth G. Kowalski Re[2]: Negative objective functions
Oct 30, 1998 Lewis B. Sheiner Re: Negative objective functions
Oct 31, 1998 James Re: Negative objective functions
Nov 01, 1998 James Re: Negative objective functions