RE: GAM analysis and further action

From: Mark Sale Date: March 29, 2006 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: Mark Sale - Next Level Solutions mark@nextlevelsolns.com Subject: RE: [NMusers] GAM analysis and further action Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:16:37 -0700 Mats, Toufigh, I have, in general been unimpressed with both the sensitivity and specificiy of plots of post-hoc etas vs potential covariates. So, I would add your first "test" (plots) to Mats' list of things that are at best, a guide on what to try. I will, once again, suggest that the complexities of the interdependencies of covariate relationships (and interdependencies of structural effects) are a violation of the assumptions on which the post-hoc-vs-covariate plot modeling approach -and the step wise modeling approach, is based. As such, we need to reasses the basic tenets of how we select models. I'm not sure about what assumptions underlie that GAM approach. Still looking for collaborators for a formal assessment of traditional|GAM|WAM|GA model selection strategy - anyone interested? Mark Sale MD Next Level Solutions, LLC www.NextLevelSolns.com
Mar 29, 2006 Toufigh Gordi GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Mats Karlsson RE: GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Paul Hutson Re: GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Jakob Ribbing RE: GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Manish Gupta Re: GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Mark Sale RE: GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Dennis Fisher GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Steven B Charnick RE: GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Marc Gastonguay Re: GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Nick Holford Re: GAM analysis and further action
Mar 30, 2006 Jakob Ribbing RE: GAM analysis and further action