RE: GAM analysis and further action

From: Mats Karlsson Date: March 29, 2006 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Mats Karlsson" mats.karlsson@farmbio.uu.se Subject: RE: [NMusers] GAM analysis and further action Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:35:42 +0200 Hi Toufigh, You have both BW and HT as candidate covariates. These are often highly correlated. Unless you have a very large data set, it is unlikely that you can separate the influence from the two. Allowing highly correlated covariates often results in models that have highly influential individuals. You can look at Cook score diagnostics in Xpose and also delete individuals (also doable in Xpose) to investigate sensitivity. However, I would not use GAM results as the final and they are really quite uninteresting to relate to p-values. It is a guide for what to try (and sometimes with what functional form) in NONMEM. Best regards, Mats -- Mats Karlsson, PhD Professor of Pharmacometrics Div. of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Therapy Dept. of Pharmaceutical Biosciences Faculty of Pharmacy Uppsala University Box 591 SE-751 24 Uppsala Sweden phone +46 18 471 4105 fax +46 18 471 4003 mats.karlsson@farmbio.uu.se
Mar 29, 2006 Toufigh Gordi GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Mats Karlsson RE: GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Paul Hutson Re: GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Jakob Ribbing RE: GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Manish Gupta Re: GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Mark Sale RE: GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Dennis Fisher GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Steven B Charnick RE: GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Marc Gastonguay Re: GAM analysis and further action
Mar 29, 2006 Nick Holford Re: GAM analysis and further action
Mar 30, 2006 Jakob Ribbing RE: GAM analysis and further action