Re: Probabilistic model

From: Chuanpu Hu Date: May 18, 2005 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: Chuanpu.Hu@sanofi-aventis.com Subject: Re: [NMusers] Probabilistic model Date: Wed, May 18, 2005 12:00 pm Nick, I knew you were up to something. :-) Still, I think your comments came from situations where the interest was in some kind of "averaged" response. I agree that in many instances you can get reasonable conclusions. I just prefer not to deal with the potential objections/difficulties. However, in an instance of my work with Steve Shafer (COST B1 1997 - details never published), categorical analysis did show insights/knowledge that we would not get if data were treated as categorical. If that would be of value, maybe I should try to convince Steve that it is worthwhile to finish the paper. ;-) Chuanpu

Thread

View all 16 messages
May 13, 2005 Leonid Gibiansky Probabilistic model
May 13, 2005 Kenneth Kowalski RE: Probabilistic model
May 13, 2005 Leonid Gibiansky Re: Probabilistic model
May 17, 2005 Vladimir Piotrovskij RE: Probabilistic model
May 17, 2005 Nick Holford Re: Probabilistic model
May 17, 2005 Chuanpu Hu Re: Probabilistic model
May 17, 2005 Vladimir Piotrovskij RE: Probabilistic model
May 17, 2005 Nick Holford Re: Probabilistic model
May 17, 2005 Leonid Gibiansky Re: Probabilistic model
May 18, 2005 Mats Karlsson RE: Probabilistic model
May 18, 2005 Nick Holford Re: Probabilistic model
May 18, 2005 Jeffrey A Wald Re: Probabilistic model
May 18, 2005 Chuanpu Hu Re: Probabilistic model
May 19, 2005 Mats Karlsson RE: Probabilistic model
May 19, 2005 Nick Holford Re: Probabilistic model
May 19, 2005 Nick Holford Re: Probabilistic model
← Previous
Next →