RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling

From: Nick Holford Date: June 10, 2004 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: Nick Holford n.holford@auckland.ac.nz Subject: RE:[NMusers] $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling Date: Thu, June 10, 2004 3:55 pm Ken and Leonid, Thanks for all your thoughtful remarks and suggestions. I am afraid I am rather busy this week (leaving tomorrow for PAGE and 2 weeks in Europe) so I don't have time to take up the suggested investigations right now. But a quick thought -- Can either of you provide a data based example where you can show that bootstrap runs that minimized successfully with $COV produced more reliable parameter estimates than those that did not complete $COV or terminated? It seems that much of the discussion is based on opinion rather than data. I have offered some data to test the hypothesis that successful runs (+/- $COV) are better than all bootstrap runs. I realize it is only one data set (and I am working on another as I type) but it is data not just opinion. Nick -- Nick Holford, Dept Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology University of Auckland, 85 Park Rd, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand email:n.holford@auckland.ac.nz tel:+64(9)373-7599x86730 fax:373-7556 http://www.health.auckland.ac.nz/pharmacology/staff/nholford/
May 31, 2004 Justin Wilkins $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 01, 2004 Nick Holford RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 01, 2004 Mark Sale RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 01, 2004 Leonid Gibiansky RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 01, 2004 Nick Holford RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 02, 2004 Kenneth Kowalski RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 02, 2004 Marc Gastonguay RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 02, 2004 Kenneth Kowalski RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 02, 2004 Jeffrey A Wald RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 02, 2004 Marc Gastonguay RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 03, 2004 Nick Holford RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 03, 2004 Jeffrey A Wald RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 03, 2004 Kenneth Kowalski RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 05, 2004 Mats Karlsson RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 05, 2004 Nick Holford RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 08, 2004 Kenneth Kowalski RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 08, 2004 Kenneth Kowalski RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 08, 2004 Leonid Gibiansky RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 09, 2004 Kenneth Kowalski RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 10, 2004 Nick Holford RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 10, 2004 Leonid Gibiansky RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 10, 2004 Nick Holford RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 10, 2004 Kenneth Kowalski RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 10, 2004 Leonid Gibiansky RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 11, 2004 Matt Hutmacher RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 11, 2004 Nick Holford RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 29, 2004 Kenneth Kowalski RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jun 30, 2004 Nick Holford RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling
Jul 02, 2004 Kenneth Kowalski RE: $OMEGA blocks and log-likelihood profiling