PRED VS WRES

5 messages 3 people Latest: Jul 27, 2001

PRED VS WRES

From: Ahmed Eltahtawy Date: July 27, 2001 technical
From: "Eltahtawy, Ahmed" <Ahmed.Eltahtawy@pharma.com> Subject: PRED VS WRES Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 14:58:24 -0400 Dear All, I have a question for the group about Pred vs Wres plots. I pooled data for IV, IR, SR formulations and the IV gives me the most biased PRED VS WRES pattern (S shape trend)!! In spite of using the flexible error model (add+prop). Does anyone have any experience or explanation for this?. would a separate error model for each formulation be reasonable? I tempted even to analyze the data separately? Or just remove the IV data? As I don't have the actual sampling times. Thanks for your time in advance. Regards Ahmed

Re: PRED VS WRES

From: Lewis B. Sheiner Date: July 27, 2001 technical
From: Lewis B Sheiner <lewis@c255.ucsf.edu> Subject: Re: PRED VS WRES Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 12:32:43 -0700 WRES tends to be diagnostic for the within-individual (i.e PK) model. If by "S shape trend" you mean that the residuals follow a trend to be first >0 and then <0, then this suggests that you need to further elaborate your PK structural model (e.g., a 2 compartment model instead of a 1-compartment model). And if this were so, it would make sense that it would be seen most readily with the IV data rather than with dosage forms exhibiting slower absorption. A better plot, in my opinion, for diagnosing the adequacy of the subject-specific mdoel is IPRED vs IWRES. -- _/ _/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ Lewis B Sheiner, MD (lewis@c255.ucsf.edu) _/ _/ _/ _/_ _/_/ Professor: Lab. Med., Biophmct. Sci., Med. _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ Box 0626, UCSF, SF, CA, 94143-0626 _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/ 415-476-1965 (v), 415-476-2796 (fax)

RE: PRED VS WRES

From: Ahmed Eltahtawy Date: July 27, 2001 technical
From: "Eltahtawy, Ahmed" <Ahmed.Eltahtawy@pharma.com> Subject: RE: PRED VS WRES Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 15:57:49 -0400 Yes, The WRES tend to be first >0 and then <0. The fit to the IV data alone is little better with the 2 comp Model. Unfortunately, this is not the case with the IR and SR formulations. When all the data is pooled together I opted for 1 cmp. Model. I don't think a mixture model would be of any help. I will try the IPRED VS IWRES; but I still can't understand how an IV gives the worst diagnostics.. Thanks Regards Ahmed

Pred vs Wres

From: Ferrin Harrison Date: July 27, 2001 technical
From: "Ferrin Harrison 301-827-3213 FAX 301-480-2825" <HARRISONF@cder.fda.gov> Subject: Pred vs Wres Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 16:23:26 -0400 (EDT) What models for an entry compartment would conceal a downstream compartment? In particular, could the SR rate be sufficiently slow to conceal one of the IV compartments, rendering one compartment comparable to infinite rate of elimination or equilibration? By conceal I mean render difficult or impossible to estimate for the data available. I can't conceive of an entry compartment mathematically neutralizing a downstream compartment.

RE: Pred vs Wres

From: Ahmed Eltahtawy Date: July 27, 2001 technical
From: "Eltahtawy, Ahmed" <Ahmed.Eltahtawy@pharma.com> Subject: RE: Pred vs Wres Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 17:07:02 -0400 I have a dual absorption model to describe the complex absorption for the SR data. One of these is really slow.. Regards Ahmed