Re: Distribution of CWRESI as a diagnostic

From: Andrew Hooker Date: November 15, 2022 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Hi Rik, In some investigations that Joakim Nyberg and I did at PAGE a while back, we saw that CWRESI were less likely to be N(0,1) even if the model is correct, compared to CWRES (Nyberg, Bauer, Hooker, PAGE, 2010). So I might recommend creating the plot with CWRES. Otherwise, you could do multiple simulation-evaluations with the model that you have to get an empirical understanding of the expected CWRESI distribution, if the model you are currently using was the model that generated the data. This could be done using the “simeval” tool in NONMEM and “tricking” PsN into thinking that the CWRESI are actually the CWRES by setting (CWRES=CWRESI) in the table file (not tested, but I suspect this will work). On a side note, I think my NMUSERS account is associated with my old “farmbio” email address, so maybe you could forward this to note to NMUSERS? Best regards, Andy Andrew Hooker, Ph.D. Professor of Pharmacometrics Dept. of Pharmacy Uppsala University Box 580, 751 23, Uppsala, Sweden Phone: +46 18 471 4355 https://katalog.uu.se/profile/?id=N4-631 https://katalog.uu.se/profile/?id=N4-631 http://www.farmbio.uu.se/research/researchgroups/pharmacometrics/
Quoted reply history
On 15 Nov 2022, at 09:53, Rik Schoemaker <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Dear all, I have routinely generated a histogram of CWRESI residuals as a model diagnostic, expecting the standard deviation to be close to one, and then commenting 'the SD is close to one as would be expected in a well behaved model'. However, I have now run into a situation where the SD is 0.887 which I consider a lot lower than I'd expect, but I have no clue what that tells me... Any ideas? Should I stop making the plot? ;) Kind regards, Rik Rik Schoemaker, PhD Occams Coöperatie U.A. Malandolaan 10 1187 HE Amstelveen The Netherlands http://www.occams.com/ +31 20 441 6410 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <image001.png> När du har kontakt med oss på Uppsala universitet med e-post så innebär det att vi behandlar dina personuppgifter. För att läsa mer om hur vi gör det kan du läsa här: http://www.uu.se/om-uu/dataskydd-personuppgifter/ E-mailing Uppsala University means that we will process your personal data. For more information on how this is performed, please read here: http://www.uu.se/en/about-uu/data-protection-policy
Nov 15, 2022 Rik Schoemaker Distribution of CWRESI as a diagnostic
Nov 15, 2022 Buclin Thierry RE: Distribution of CWRESI as a diagnostic
Nov 15, 2022 Martin Bergstrand Re: Distribution of CWRESI as a diagnostic
Nov 15, 2022 Andrew Hooker Re: Distribution of CWRESI as a diagnostic
Nov 17, 2022 Rik Schoemaker RE: Distribution of CWRESI as a diagnostic