RE: Distribution of CWRESI as a diagnostic

From: Buclin Thierry Date: November 15, 2022 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Hi Rik Isn’t this simply the expression of an ε-shrinkage phenomenon, bringing the individual predictions close to the observations, possibly due to model overparametrization? Beware of models trying to be too well behaved! Best regards Thierry CHUV University Hospital Centre of the Canton de Vaud Pr Thierry BUCLIN, MD, head physician Service of Clinical Pharmacology Institutes building, Bugnon 17, 1st floor 1011 Lausanne - SWITZERLAND
Quoted reply history
De : [email protected] <[email protected]> De la part de Rik Schoemaker Envoyé : mardi 15 novembre 2022 09:54 À : [email protected] Objet : [NMusers] Distribution of CWRESI as a diagnostic Dear all, I have routinely generated a histogram of CWRESI residuals as a model diagnostic, expecting the standard deviation to be close to one, and then commenting 'the SD is close to one as would be expected in a well behaved model'. However, I have now run into a situation where the SD is 0.887 which I consider a lot lower than I'd expect, but I have no clue what that tells me... Any ideas? Should I stop making the plot? ;) Kind regards, Rik Rik Schoemaker, PhD Occams Coöperatie U.A. Malandolaan 10 1187 HE Amstelveen The Netherlands http://www.occams.com +31 20 441 6410 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [image001.png]
Nov 15, 2022 Rik Schoemaker Distribution of CWRESI as a diagnostic
Nov 15, 2022 Buclin Thierry RE: Distribution of CWRESI as a diagnostic
Nov 15, 2022 Martin Bergstrand Re: Distribution of CWRESI as a diagnostic
Nov 15, 2022 Andrew Hooker Re: Distribution of CWRESI as a diagnostic
Nov 17, 2022 Rik Schoemaker RE: Distribution of CWRESI as a diagnostic