Re: ASCO and pharmacometrics

From: Markus Joerger Date: April 07, 2016 technical Source: mail-archive.com
dear Naoto, dear Community, This is indeed an issue as important as difficult. As a medical oncologist and convinced 'pharmacometrician', I see the 'gap' between good PKPD-data and the difficulties implementing these data into treatment algorithms for cancer patients. We had a poster presentation submitted to ASCO-2016 similarly refused; the data show a clinically important drug-drug interaction between a taxane and a small molecule in development, an information of high interest to the community involved in the development of These specific anticancer drug/drug combinations. In my humble opinion, there has to be a 'politically active' group of oncologists to support these topics at larger oncology meetings, as only this will result in the implementation of the knowledge generated from PKPD-modeling into anticancer drug research. best regards, Markus Markus Joerger MD-PhD ClinPharm Dep. of Medical Oncology&Hematology Cantonal Hospital St.Gallen CH-9007 St.Gallen Switzerland [email protected] Phone: +41-765591070 Fax: +41-714946325 President SAKK - New Anticancer Drugs Group
Quoted reply history
2016-04-06 3:38 GMT+02:00 Naoto Hayashi <[email protected]>: > > Dear all, > > > > I have a question and appreciate it if somebody can answer to me. > > > > We had submitted an abstract to ASCO annual meeting presentation 2016, and > its contents included a pharmacometrics work of quantitative safety profile > analysis of an anticancer drug. The behave of the safety index time > courses is very unique and its results showed a very high usefulness of > this drug. The abstract also included the table of population PK/PD > parameters that expressed its nature, and it was compared with the similar > older drug safety profile and demonstrated very high safer profile > quantitatively. > > > > I have some experiences to publish some articles of population PK/PD work > in several clinical pharmacology journals in the past, and I was so > confident for just a poster presentation in ASCO. However, the judgment > was “publication only”, i.e. just presentation in online but no poster > presentation and no official record of publication officially. > > > > So, my question is whether pharmacometrics work is difficult to be picked > up in ASCO presentation. Or, was my work evaluated to have no worth to be > presented even in poster session because the pharmacometrics works > presented in ASCO are having very high level? > > > > I have never visited ASCO before, and I just want to hear opinions about > how much of importance is considered for pharmacometrics work in ASCO. > > > > Thanks a lot in advance for your comments/thoughts. > > > > Best regards, > > Naoto Hayashi >
Apr 06, 2016 Naoto Hayashi ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 06, 2016 Manish R Sharma Re: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 06, 2016 Joachim Grevel RE: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 06, 2016 Pascal Girard RE: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 06, 2016 Nick Holford Re: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 07, 2016 Phil Lowe RE: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 07, 2016 Dennis Fisher Re: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 07, 2016 Markus Joerger Re: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 07, 2016 Joga Gobburu RE: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 08, 2016 Naoto Hayashi RE: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 08, 2016 Pascal Girard Re: ASCO and pharmacometrics