Re: ASCO and pharmacometrics

From: Dennis Fisher Date: April 07, 2016 technical Source: mail-archive.com
I agree with Phil. I have presented recently at two large endocrine meetings, one in the US, one in Europe. In both cases, I took complicated PK/PD models and kept it simple, emphasizing how the models could / would be used in clinical development and clinical practice. The response at both meetings was excellent — lots of people expressing interest in the models (and, interestingly, two of the competitors to the company for which I was consulting tried to enlist my consulting help). And, I disagree with Nick’s comment yesterday. Perhaps oncology clinicians are concerned about commas (I cannot speak to that issue) but I truly doubt Nick’s claim that they don’t care about science — the advances in oncology in recent years have been remarkable. Dennis Fisher MD P < (The "P Less Than" Company) Phone: 1-866-PLessThan (1-866-753-7784) Fax: 1-866-PLessThan (1-866-753-7784) www.PLessThan.com http://www.plessthan.com/
Quoted reply history
> On Apr 7, 2016, at 7:49 AM, Lowe, Phil <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would echo Pascal’s point. Getting pharmacometric work into large clinical > conferences is not straightforward. It can be done (see > link) http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/46/suppl_59/PA5091.abstract > http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/46/suppl_59/PA5091.abstract but note > where I was in the author list as the sole modeller. It helps to work closely > with the clinicians on the messaging. That said, it was fun at the meeting, > explaining the data and model curves to clinicians with them asking how such > knowledge could impact their patients. An eye-opener. Keep trying Naoto! > > All the best, Phil > > Philip J Lowe PhD > Executive Director Pharmacometrics Scientist > Novartis Pharma AG, WSJ-027.6.25 or WSJ-386.12.48.46 > 4056 Basel, Switzerland > Phone: +41 61 324 4676 > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] > On Behalf Of Pascal Girard > Sent: 06 April 2016 10:39 > To: Naoto Hayashi; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Cc: nmusers > Subject: RE: [NMusers] ASCO and pharmacometrics > > Dear Naoto, > > In the past, Rene Bruno got one poster accepted with discussion at ASCO. He > is our ”champion” ! > > I got one accepted on model for Exp-Tumor Size – OS at European Cancer > Congress 2013 . But I can tell you that a medical writer rewrote it entirely > and it took 1 month to get it reviewed and corrected by clinicians > challenging every comma and p-value. > > To give you an idea of the respective size of the meetings: ACOP N=500, PAGE > N>600, ECC N> 10,000, ASCO N>20,000. > > So the advice I would give, is just improve the quality and readability of > our abstract and it will make it. By readability, I mean show it to an > oncologist clinician. If he does not understand, rewrite it with the help of > a medical writer … > > With best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Cordialement > > Pascal
Apr 06, 2016 Naoto Hayashi ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 06, 2016 Manish R Sharma Re: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 06, 2016 Joachim Grevel RE: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 06, 2016 Pascal Girard RE: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 06, 2016 Nick Holford Re: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 07, 2016 Phil Lowe RE: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 07, 2016 Dennis Fisher Re: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 07, 2016 Markus Joerger Re: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 07, 2016 Joga Gobburu RE: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 08, 2016 Naoto Hayashi RE: ASCO and pharmacometrics
Apr 08, 2016 Pascal Girard Re: ASCO and pharmacometrics