Re: RE: Estimation of ke0 from raw data

From: Peter Bonate Date: September 05, 2015 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Ken Kowalski published a paper many years ago which I think he called a semicompartmental method. It was not developed as a population approach and only applies to single dose data but works really well under those conditions. It was published in the Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics. Pete Bonate.
Quoted reply history
> On Sep 5, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Leonid Gibiansky <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Jos, > > It is not very clear what exactly you need. If you can use modeling tools, > then linear interpolation + effect compartment + Emax model for the effect > compartment versus PD dependence should work. If you would like to use only > the raw data, no modeling, NCA style analysis, then the difference between > Tmax of PK and Tmax of PD could be used as a crude estimate of the delay. Or > you can use hysteresis curve for the PK curve with the time delay (with > linear interpolation) and PD, and change the time delay for PK part until the > hysteresis would disappear (using some metrics what does it mean "disappear"; > may be area inside the loop is small). The time shift that provides smallest > hysteresis area is the delay time. > > Leonid > > > > -------------------------------------- > Leonid Gibiansky, Ph.D. > President, QuantPharm LLC > web: www.quantpharm.com > e-mail: LGibiansky at quantpharm.com > tel: (301) 767 5566 > > > >> On 9/5/2015 2:44 PM, Lommerse, JPM (Jos) wrote: >> Dear Samer, >> >> Thank you for the reference. >> >> However, the method of Fuseau assumes >> >> that a mathematical description for >> >> the PK curve is available. >> >> I would like to do without such a PK description >> >> and directly use the PK observations, e.g. applying >> >> linear interpolation between the PK data points. >> >> Would that be feasible? >> >> Thanks, Jos >> >> *From:*Samer Mouksassi [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Saturday, September 05, 2015 8:34 PM >> *To:* Lommerse, JPM (Jos); [email protected] >> *Subject:* RE: Estimation of ke0 from raw data >> >> Dear Jos, >> >> Please have a look at the algorithm detailed in the appendix of this >> publication: >> >> Fuseau E, Sheiner LB. >> >> Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics with a >> nonparametric pharmacodynamic model. >> >> Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1984 Jun;35(6):733-41. >> >> Regards, >> >> Samer >> >> *From:* [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Lommerse, JPM (Jos) >> *Sent:* Saturday, September 5, 2015 1:44 PM >> *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> *Subject:* [NMusers] Estimation of ke0 from raw data >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a data set containing PK concentrations and PD effect. >> >> When plotting PD as a function of PD a clear anti-clockwise hysteresis >> >> plot appears. >> >> I would like to get a (rough) estimate of the PD time delay w.r.t. the >> PK without >> >> using a compartmental description for the observed PK, even not using >> >> a polynomal function that fits the PK. The assumption I make is that >> >> all PD delay can be explained by the delay through an effect compartment. >> >> I am wondering if methods exist that solely use the raw data to >> >> calculate such time delays. >> >> Thank you for any comment/suggestion, >> >> Jos >> >> *Jos Lommerse* >> >> Modeler Consultant >> >> /Quantitative Solutions BV/ >> >> /Molenweg 79/ >> >> /5349 AC Oss/ >> >> /The Netherlands/ >> >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> +31 412 211102 >> >> Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains >> information of Merck & Co., Inc. (2000 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, >> New Jersey, USA 07033), and/or its affiliates Direct contact information >> for affiliates is available at >> http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be confidential, >> proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely >> for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are >> not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, >> please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from >> your system. >> >> *NOTICE: *The information contained in this electronic mail message is >> intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated >> recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client >> communication, may be protected by the work product doctrine, and may be >> subject to a protective order. As such, this message is privileged and >> confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended >> recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended >> recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message >> in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of >> this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >> communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and >> e-mail and destroy any and all copies of this message in your possession >> (whether hard copies or electronically stored copies). Thank you. >> >> >> buSp9xeMeKEbrUze >> >> Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains >> information of Merck & Co., Inc. (2000 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, >> New Jersey, USA 07033), and/or its affiliates Direct contact information >> for affiliates is available at >> http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be confidential, >> proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely >> for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are >> not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, >> please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from >> your system. >>
Sep 05, 2015 Jpm Lommerse Estimation of ke0 from raw data
Sep 05, 2015 Mukul Re: Estimation of ke0 from raw data
Sep 05, 2015 Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap Re: RE: Estimation of ke0 from raw data
Sep 05, 2015 Leonid Gibiansky Re: RE: Estimation of ke0 from raw data
Sep 05, 2015 Peter Bonate Re: RE: Estimation of ke0 from raw data
Sep 05, 2015 Brian Sadler RE: RE: Estimation of ke0 from raw data
Sep 08, 2015 Jpm Lommerse RE: RE: Estimation of ke0 from raw data
Sep 14, 2015 J.h.proost Re: RE: Estimation of ke0 from raw data
Sep 14, 2015 Unknown Re: RE: Estimation of ke0 from raw data