RE: Does inter-CPU variability exist in NONMEM??
Dear Kevin and Chungam;
As some might remember, a group of NONMEM users under the lead of Pete Bonate
tried to address this issue in 2002, at the time for NONMEM V. The results were
published at the AAPS annual meeting. If anyone is interested in reviewing the
poster, I put it on a document server under
https://webdocs.uthsc.edu/xythoswfs/webview/_xy-41992_1
Best regards,
Bernd
***********************************************
Bernd Meibohm, PhD, FCP
Associate Dean for Graduate Programs & Research
Professor of Pharmaceutical Sciences
College of Pharmacy
University of Tennessee Health Science Center
874 Union Avenue, Rm. 5p
Memphis, TN 38163, U.S.A.
Phone (901) 448-1206
Fax (901) 448-6940
Email [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
************************************************
Quoted reply history
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Kevin Dykstra
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 10:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [NMusers] Does inter-CPU variability exist in NONMEM??
Dear Chungam -
You are not alone. A few years ago, I ran into a similar problem in comparing
results (probably with NONMEM V at that time) from different computers. I was
using an identical compiler on each, as well as identical compile settings
(this is worth checking in your situation). Even the operating system was the
same (Windows XP Professional), as I recall. Still I was getting subtle and not
so subtle differences, including convergence vs. non-convergence. The only
difference I could identify was, in fact, the machine on which the problem was
run. I assumed at the time that the differences were down to small differences
in the way each CPU handled floating point calculations (both were Intel,
however; one was a laptop, the other a desktop). I also suspect that the model
I was working on was not super robust, so that small differences translated
into successful or non-successful convergence. Anyway, what you are seeing is
not unheard of.
Good luck!
__________________________________________
Kevin Dykstra, PhD, FCP
President/CEO
+1 978.655.1943 (O)
+1 978.289.2987 (M)
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> |
http://qPharmetra.com http://qPharmetra.com
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail communication is confidential and is intended only for the
individual(s) or entity named above and others who have been specifically
authorized to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not
read, copy, use or disclose the contents of this communication to others.
Please notify the sender that you have received this e-mail in error by
replying to the e-mail or by telephoning 978-655-1943. Please then delete the
e-mail and any copies of it. Thank you.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of ???, Chungam Choi
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 10:55 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NMusers] Does inter-CPU variability exist in NONMEM??
Dear all
I'm a newbie in this field practicing NONMEM using a few sets of bioavailabilty
data.
2days before, I managed to make a model and got to get some parameters. Though
I couldn't
sure about it due to my poor background, they(parameters) were quite similar to
those in a paper.
Anyway, the thing was, the results were not constant in a single NMTRAN file.
I've struggled for
a few days figuring out what the problem was, but I couldn't get the first
result. After I had run the same
control file with the same data in another PC, surprisingly, I could find that
the parameters were not the same
as those from the prior PC. This had AMD X2 250/2G DDR2 DRAM(Samsung)/windows 7
32bit and
that had Intel i870/8G DDR3 DRAM(Samsung)/windows vista 32bit. Both had NONMEM
7/gfortran(in NONMEM7 CD).
My friend, a developer, said that It didn't look like the problem of the
processors but of the compiler.
Because I've had fairly good relationship with AMD for long, I want to believe
he's right.
Is anyone here who 've met a similar problem?
<<image001.png>>