RE: Very big NONMEM

From: Rik Schoemaker Date: October 08, 2010 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Dear Bernard, What I've recently found is that increasing the size of NO to 1000 would indeed make the application too large, but by then decreasing the number of subjects (MAXIDS; in my case from 15000 to 1500), it makes the footprint manageable again. Maybe going down a factor two to 7500 would have worked as well, but I didn't spend the time on testing more combinations... Apparently NONMEM 8 will adjust the sizes dynamically, but until then we'll just have to twiddle a bit ourselves :-) Cheers, Rik Rik Schoemaker, PhD Exprimo NV Tel:+31 (0)20 4416410 E-mail: [email protected] Web: <outbind://7/www.exprimo.com> www.exprimo.com _____
Quoted reply history
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bernard Murray Sent: 08 October 2010 9:13 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [NMusers] Very big NONMEM Hello there, Now that the subject of (unusually) large versions of NONMEM has been raised again, I was wondering if it is possible to increase the number of observation records per subject (NO) past the value of 500 provided in the standard "big" version of SIZES with nm7. I am working with NONMEM 7.1.2 with g95 (version 0.93!) on win32 (WinXP SP3) If I increase NO and rebuild everything (as per User Guide III 2.9.2) Windows complains ("Not a valid win32 application"). I have also tried increasing LIM1, LADD and some of the other LIM buffers. I don't know if this is a fundamental limitation or poor understanding on my part. I am actually performing simulations of a somewhat stiff system, with 6 or more DVs over long time periods (weeks). Currently I can fit things in 500 records if I am careful with the selection of timepoints but I was wondering if larger versions than "big" were possible. I have seen some discussion of this subject in previous postings but these were with nmvi or earlier. I do realise that NONMEM may not look like the best tool for this but I'd like to try fitting real world data later. Thanks for any suggestions. All the very best, Bernard Bernard Murray, Ph.D. Senior Research Scientist, Drug Metabolism Gilead Sciences, Foster City CA
Oct 08, 2010 Xavier Woot de Trixhe Very big NONMEM
Oct 08, 2010 Leonid Gibiansky Re: Very big NONMEM
Oct 08, 2010 Bernard Murray RE: Very big NONMEM
Oct 08, 2010 Rik Schoemaker RE: Very big NONMEM
Oct 08, 2010 Thomas Ludden RE: Very big NONMEM
Oct 08, 2010 Stephen Duffull RE: Very big NONMEM
Oct 11, 2010 Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap RE: Very big NONMEM
Oct 11, 2010 Xavier Woot de Trixhe Re: Very big NONMEM