Re: Block versus diagonal omega

From: Paolo Denti Date: September 03, 2010 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Hi Al, as far as I can tell, if you have a BLOCK matrix in NONMEM, the only elements that you can fix to zero (without fixing the whole block) are the ones in the lower corner of the matrix. You can have lower triangular matrices of zeros as large as all of yours off-diagonal elements (in which case the matrix would become diagonal). To do this, you just set the initial estimate of those element to exactly zero. Don't write FIX anywhere in the block, or else NONMEM is going fix the values of the whole block. Some examples would be $OMEGA BLOCK(3) a b c 0 d e or $OMEGA BLOCK(4) a b c 0 d e 0 0 f g or $OMEGA BLOCK(4) a b c d e f 0 g h j Obviously, unless you are lucky, the zeros won't be where you want them to be with the numbering you chose for the ETAs, so you might need to change the order and bring all the zeros to the lower triangle. Lots of fun! ;) Some matrices can't be obtained this way unless you sacrifice some additional correlations, I fear. Or at least I can't see how. Like the one below: $OMEGA BLOCK(4) a b c d e f 0 0 g h The only way I can think to obtain exactly this one (someone else can maybe help here) is to calculate the Cholesky factor of your matrix so that you can rewrite it the whole thing in your code using only thetas. In that way you would be able free to fix whatever you want to any value. Hope this is not too confusing... Greetings from Cape Town, Paolo
Quoted reply history
On 02/09/2010 22:39, Berg, Alexander K., Pharm.D., Ph.D. wrote: > Everyone - > > Thank you all for your assistance in answering my question regarding the block versus diagonal omega structure. The answers that you all provided have been a great help thus far and are much appreciated. As a follow-up, I was curious if someone could point me towards a reference that would help me to figure out how to restructure the covariance into different omega blocks. Specifically, I would like to understand the basis and proper method for restructuring the omega block so that I may remove selected covariance terms when simplifying from a completely unstructured block to a more parsimonious one. Thanks again for your help and time - > > Al Berg -- ------------------------------------------------ Paolo Denti, PhD Post-Doctoral Fellow Division of Clinical Pharmacology Department of Medicine University of Cape Town K45 Old Main Building Groote Schuur Hospital Observatory, Cape Town 7925 South Africa phone: +27 21 404 7719 fax: +27 21 448 1989 email:[email protected]
Aug 25, 2010 Alexander Berg Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 25, 2010 Bioengineering Faculty Search Fwd: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 25, 2010 Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 25, 2010 William Bachman RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 25, 2010 Serge Guzy RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 26, 2010 Ye Hongbo RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 26, 2010 Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 26, 2010 Mark Sale RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 27, 2010 Doug J. Eleveld RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 27, 2010 Mark Sale RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 29, 2010 Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 30, 2010 Chuanpu Hu FW: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 30, 2010 Leonid Gibiansky Re: FW: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 30, 2010 Yaming Hang RE: FW: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 30, 2010 Mark Sale RE: FW: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 31, 2010 Leonid Gibiansky Re: FW: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 31, 2010 Chuanpu Hu RE: FW: Block versus diagonal omega
Sep 02, 2010 Alexander Berg RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Sep 03, 2010 Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Sep 03, 2010 Paolo Denti Re: Block versus diagonal omega
Sep 03, 2010 Thomas Ludden RE: Block versus diagonal omega