RE: Block versus diagonal omega

From: Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap Date: August 25, 2010 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Hi Al, One basis is to treat on off-diagonal element as just any other parameter, and use your normal methods to decide whether to include it or not. You may however, depending on the objective of your model, also use another basis. Simulation purposes may largely benefit from off-diagonal elements as off-diagonal elements limit the parameter space the etas may expand into. E.g. VPCs may offer you diagnostics in this respect. Such considerations may let you decide on a different trade-off. The reason that diagonal elements are more frequently encountered is probably that they are more difficult to estimate, with more frequent covariance failures and the like. But they are also more difficult to implement, as it is not always straightforward to detect where those elements can be inserted e.g. under shrinkage. Thirdly, perhaps not all modelers are aware of the possibilities they offer. Best regards, Jeroen Modeling & Simulation Expert Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics & Pharmacometrics (P3) - DMPK MSD PO Box 20 - AP1112 5340 BH Oss The Netherlands [email protected] T: +31 (0)412 66 9320 M: +31 (0)6 46 101 283 F: +31 (0)412 66 2506 www.msd.com
Quoted reply history
________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Berg, Alexander K., Pharm.D., Ph.D. Sent: Wednesday, 25 August, 2010 21:20 To: [email protected] Subject: [NMusers] Block versus diagonal omega Hello - I was curious if someone from the group could perhaps describe the basis for deciding whether to use a block (variance and covariance) versus diagonal (variance only) form of omega. Specifically, what tests if any can be performed to decide between the two forms and are there certain situations where one is preferred over the other as I often see only the diagonal form used. Any help would be much appreciated - Al Berg, PhD/PharmD Clinical Pharmacology Fellow Mayo Clinic - Rochester [email protected] This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, use or distribution of the information included in this message is prohibited --- Please immediately and permanently delete.
Aug 25, 2010 Alexander Berg Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 25, 2010 Bioengineering Faculty Search Fwd: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 25, 2010 Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 25, 2010 William Bachman RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 25, 2010 Serge Guzy RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 26, 2010 Ye Hongbo RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 26, 2010 Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 26, 2010 Mark Sale RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 27, 2010 Doug J. Eleveld RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 27, 2010 Mark Sale RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 29, 2010 Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 30, 2010 Chuanpu Hu FW: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 30, 2010 Leonid Gibiansky Re: FW: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 30, 2010 Yaming Hang RE: FW: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 30, 2010 Mark Sale RE: FW: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 31, 2010 Leonid Gibiansky Re: FW: Block versus diagonal omega
Aug 31, 2010 Chuanpu Hu RE: FW: Block versus diagonal omega
Sep 02, 2010 Alexander Berg RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Sep 03, 2010 Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap RE: Block versus diagonal omega
Sep 03, 2010 Paolo Denti Re: Block versus diagonal omega
Sep 03, 2010 Thomas Ludden RE: Block versus diagonal omega