advan8 vs. advan13

From: NONMEM Date: October 31, 2009 technical Source: cognigen.com
Hello NONMEM users, Because advan13 was recomended for both stiff and nonstiff differential equations, I used it for stiff differential equations. It appeared that some results looked too sensitive to a parameters representing a "slow" processes. I did not observe it with nonmem6. When I used advan8, the objective function changed from 10228.853 (the final value; diagnostic plots looked good) to 5512.594 (the first value; I im still waiting for the final value of the objective function). Does it mean that advan13 should be used with caution when the equations are stiff or advan13 cannot replace advan8? Thanks, Pavel
Oct 31, 2009 NONMEM advan8 vs. advan13
Nov 01, 2009 NONMEM advan8 vs. advan13
Nov 01, 2009 Nick Holford Re: advan8 vs. advan13
Nov 02, 2009 Thomas Ludden RE: advan8 vs. advan13
Nov 02, 2009 Robert Bauer RE: advan8 vs. advan13
Nov 02, 2009 Nick Holford Re: advan8 vs. advan13
Nov 02, 2009 NONMEM Re: advan8 vs. advan13
Nov 03, 2009 NONMEM Re: advan8 vs. advan13