RE: FW: NONMEM VI 2.x Bug Alert #2 and NONMEM 7.1.0 Bug Alert #1

From: Sam Liao Date: October 31, 2009 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Dear Tom: I have a question on the different results from NM5.1 vs. NM6.20. I have PK data fitted by a two-compartment open model with first-order absorption. The results from NM5.10 and NM6.20 are quite different in that all BSV of CL/F, V2/F, V3/F, etc were smaller, yet the proportional residue was higher (49% vs. 36%) in NM5.10. It appears to me that the results from NM6.20 has better estimates than that from NM5.10. However, the objective function from NM5.1 is much smaller than that from NM6.20. Can we compare the objective function from these two version of NM? I know there were changes made in the Laplacian method and FOCI. Best regards, Sam
Quoted reply history
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ludden, Thomas Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 4:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [NMusers] FW: NONMEM VI 2.x Bug Alert #2 and NONMEM 7.1.0 Bug Alert #1 It has been found that the NONMEM VI 2.x fix for the SS=2 bug described in the previous Bug Alert (see below) can, in certain cases, result in: 1) the program hanging when the initial steady-state feature is used with SS=2 2) the failure to provide the intended steady-state dose when SS=2 is used. At this time, problem 2) has only been observed with ADVAN12. If you have made the fix to PRED.for or installed the fixed routine provided at the IDS ftp site it should be backed out. Tom Thomas M. Ludden Ph.D. Vice-President, Pharmacometrics R&D ICON Development Solutions Tel: + 1 410 696 3040 Mob: + 1 410 258 2411 Fax: + 1 410 480 0776 Email: [email protected] Web: www.icondevsolutions.com -----Original Message----- From: Ludden, Thomas Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 3:09 PM To: Nmusers Subject: NONMEM VI 2.x Bug Alert #2 and NONMEM 7.1.0 Bug Alert #1 ======================================================================== ========== Two bugs that affect NONMEM VI and NONMEM 7.1.0 have recently been discovered. Fixes and fixed routines are available for NONMEM VI 2.x as described below. After all code changes listed here and in NONMNEM VI 2.0 Bug Alert #1 (see ftp://nonmem.iconplc.com/Public/nonmem/NONMEM_VI_buglist/NONMEM_VI_2.1_B ug_List.txt for a cumulative list) are made, the nm\BLKDAT.for routine should be edited. The value of LEV in BLKDAT should be changed to 2.2. All routines in nm, pr and tr directories should be recompiled. Rerun the CDsetup6.bat or SETUP script from the installation directory using the same arguments used for the original installation with the exception of the last argument. This argument should be y to indicated the need to recompile. Fix code for NONMEM 7.1.0 will be made available soon. The NONMEM Development Team _______________________________________________________________________ PREDPP There is a PREDPP bug in pr/PRED.for (NONMEM VI 2.x) and pr/PRED.f90 (NONMEM 7.1.0) that affects the behavior of the steady-state (SS) data item when: 1) SS has a value of 2 and 2) the record with SS=2 precedes all other records with a non-zero SS data item in an individual record or after a reset record, EVID=3 or 4. The bug causes the steady state dose to be applied twice. Fix for NONMEM VI 2.x: In pr/PRED locate IF (ISSNOW.NE.0) THEN ISSNOW=0 GO TO 2200 ENDIF Change the test from .NE. to .GE. IF (ISSNOW.GE.0) THEN ISSNOW=0 GO TO 2200 ENDIF A fixed subroutine is available at ftp://nonmem.iconplc.com/Public/nonmem/NONMEM_VI_fixed_routines/ To access this folder point your browser to ftp://nonmem.iconplc.com/Public/nonmem/ and login. user: nonmemvi password: updates then open the folder named NONMEM_VI_fixed_routines. The fixed PRED.for routine is in the subfolder named PREDPP_14OCT2009 Workaround: 1) If SS=2 is the first record of the individual record, then a work around is to specify the AMT value on the affected record to be one-half the intended dose. Or, the $PK block could be modified instead. Suppose there is only one steady state dose record having SS=2, and the dose is for compartment 1. Add: $PK F1=1 IF (SS.EQ.2) F1=.5 2) If SS=2 is used in a subsequent record (with a change in TIME) and it is not preceded by a record with a non-zero value for SS then there is no workaround. This situation occurs when a transient dose precedes the steady state dose. Suggestion: The behavior of the steady-state data item, even in the absence of the bug, is relatively complex. A user planning to incorporate the SS data item into a data set should review Chapter V, Section F of NONMEM Users Guide VI, PREDPP, and Chapter 6, Section 8.2.3 of Guide V, Introductory Guide. __________________________________________________________________ NONMEM There is a bug in NONMEM VI 1.x & 2.x and NONMEM 7.1.0 that results in the spurious error message below, or a similar message, when certain band symmetric matrices are defined in $OMEGA. PROGRAM TERMINATED BY OBJ OMEGA ESTIMATED TO BE SINGULAR MESSAGE ISSUED FROM ESTIMATION STEP AT INITIAL OBJ. FUNCTION EVALUATION Fix for NONMEM VI 2.x requires changes to several subroutines. The fixed subroutines are available at ftp://nonmem.iconplc.com/Public/nonmem/NONMEM_VI_fixed_routines/ To access this folder point your browser to ftp://nonmem.iconplc.com/Public/nonmem/ and login. user: nonmemvi password: updates then open the folder named NONMEM_VI_fixed_routines. The fixed CN.for, CN1.for, CN2.for, RESCN.for, and RSCN.for routines are in the subfolder named NONMEM_14OCT2009. Workaround: None is available.
Oct 15, 2009 Thomas Ludden NONMEM VI 2.x Bug Alert #2 and NONMEM 7.1.0 Bug Alert #1
Oct 23, 2009 Thomas Ludden FW: NONMEM VI 2.x Bug Alert #2 and NONMEM 7.1.0 Bug Alert #1
Oct 31, 2009 Sam Liao RE: FW: NONMEM VI 2.x Bug Alert #2 and NONMEM 7.1.0 Bug Alert #1
Nov 02, 2009 Thomas Ludden RE: FW: NONMEM VI 2.x Bug Alert #2 and NONMEM 7.1.0 Bug Alert #1