RE: Very small P-Value for ETABAR

From: Jakob Ribbing Date: November 13, 2008 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Hi Jian, As Bill says, including a covariate may fix your problem. However, two other underlying problems may also be causing this: 1. Asymmetric shrinkage of the eta. Two examples of this that I have seen is if you have an eta on epsilon (different residual-error magnitude in different subjects) or if the doses yield a clear effect in some subjects but not in others (eta on EC50/EC50 may become more shrunk on the right tail, since any drug effect in the less sensitive subjects is difficult to separate from the background noise or circadian variation). An important covariate may reduce the degree of shrinkage and the asymmetry in the shrinkage. Other than that, shrinkage is not an issue unless you use the empirical Bayes estimates for diagnostics, i.e. use the individual parameters in graphs, calculations, PK predictions as input to the PD model (IPK approach), etc. 2. Incorrect distributional assumptions: The parametric model assumes e.g. a log-normal distribution of the parameter, around its typical value. If this is not correct eta bar may become biased. You may try other transformations in nonmem, e.g. proportional or other, so-called semi-parametric distributions. For references on Semi-parameteric distributions, search abstracts from Petterson, Hanze, Savic and Karlsson. For reference on shrinkage, see the publication below. Cheers Jakob Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jul;82(1):17-20. Links Diagnosing model diagnostics.Karlsson MO, Savic RM. Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Conclusions from clinical trial results that are derived from model-based analyses rely on the model adequately describing the underlying system. The traditionally used diagnostics intended to provide information about model adequacy have seldom discussed shortcomings. Without an understanding of the properties of these diagnostics, development and use of new diagnostics, and additional information pertaining to the diagnostics, there is risk that adequate models will be rejected and inadequate models accepted. Thus, a diagnosis of available diagnostics is desirable.
Quoted reply history
________________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Denney, William S. Sent: 13 November 2008 15:41 To: Jian Xu; [email protected] Subject: RE: [NMusers] Very small P-Value for ETABAR Hi Jian, I would look for a covariate effect on that parameter. Thanks, Bill ________________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jian Xu Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 10:16 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [NMusers] Very small P-Value for ETABAR Dear NMUSERS, A few years back, there was a discussion on the P-value for ETABAR. However, I am not sure how to appropriately handle very small P-value(s) for ETABAR situation during the development of a model. I need some clarifications to a few questions: 1: Should we just ignore this small P-Value warning? 2: Can we change IIV model to avoid small P-value for ETABAR? Or any other suggestions? 3: Does NONMEM make any assumptions on ETA distribution? This P-value for ETABAR really bugs me a lot. I look forward to seeing some input. Thank you and I appreicate your time and help. Jian Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp & Dohme or MSD and in Japan, as Banyu - direct contact information for affiliates is available at http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system.
Nov 13, 2008 Jian Xu Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 13, 2008 Bill Denney RE: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 13, 2008 Pankaj Gupta RE: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 13, 2008 Jakob Ribbing RE: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 13, 2008 Yaning Wang RE: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 13, 2008 Leonid Gibiansky Re: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 13, 2008 Nick Holford Re: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 13, 2008 Xia LI Re: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 13, 2008 Kyun-seop Bae RE: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 14, 2008 Nick Holford Re: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 14, 2008 Jakob Ribbing RE: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 14, 2008 Mats Karlsson RE: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 14, 2008 Kenneth Kowalski RE: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 14, 2008 Xia Li RE: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 14, 2008 Leonid Gibiansky Re: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 17, 2008 Xia LI Re: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 17, 2008 Nick Holford Re: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 17, 2008 Jakob Ribbing RE: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 17, 2008 Matt Hutmacher RE: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 17, 2008 Xia Li RE: Very small P-Value for ETABAR
Nov 18, 2008 Xia Li RE: Very small P-Value for ETABAR