Residuals and INTERACTION for simultaneous PK/PD, impossible?

From: Doug J. Eleveld Date: April 15, 2005 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Eleveld, DJ" d.j.eleveld@anest.umcg.nl Subject: [NMusers] Residuals and INTERACTION for simultaneous PK/PD, impossible? Date: Fri, April 15, 2005 7:34 am Hi everyone, Thanks very much to the very knowledgeable users of the list I understand that INTERACTION should be used when residuals are expected to be heteroscastic and shouldnt be used when residuals are expected to be homoscastic. However I am confused as what to do in the simultaneous PK/PD case. Here my PK residuals are expected to be heteroscastic (so INTEACTION should be used) but my PD residuals are expected to be homoscastic (so INTERACTION should not be used). I cant do both at the same time, but my data does contain both kinds of residuals at the same time. There is much discussion in the archives about simultaneious PK/PD but they seem to discuss finding the 'right' parameters. I could find no posts that brought up if INTERACTION should be used or not. I seem to get better fitting without INTERACTION, but I think this is simply just due to the fact that I have more PD data then PK data. Anyone have any ideas about the correct way to approach this? Thanks very much, Doug Eleveld
Apr 15, 2005 Doug J. Eleveld Residuals and INTERACTION for simultaneous PK/PD, impossible?
Apr 15, 2005 Vladimir Piotrovskij RE: Residuals and INTERACTION for simultaneous PK/PD, impos sible?
Apr 15, 2005 Yaning Wang RE: Residuals and INTERACTION for simultaneous PK/PD,i mpos sible?
Apr 16, 2005 Nick Holford Re: Residuals and INTERACTION for simultaneous PK/PD,impossible?