Re: Residuals and INTERACTION for simultaneous PK/PD,impossible?

From: Nick Holford Date: April 16, 2005 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Nick Holford" n.holford@auckland.ac.nz Subject: Re: [NMusers] Residuals and INTERACTION for simultaneous PK/PD,impossible? Date: Sat, April 16, 2005 1:35 am Eleveld, I agree with Yaning that it should make no difference if you use INTERACTION with a homoscedastic residual error model. I like his elegant explanation of how NONMEM is trying to solve the problem. It seems to me that INTERACTION should be a default option for METHOD=CONDITIONAL. I don't know how it can adversely effect the result except possibly for a bit of extra computation time. The current default (no INTERACTION) is an unfortunate pitfall if you are either unaware of this issue of simply overlook it in the excitement of building a new model. Nick _______________________________________________________
Apr 15, 2005 Doug J. Eleveld Residuals and INTERACTION for simultaneous PK/PD, impossible?
Apr 15, 2005 Vladimir Piotrovskij RE: Residuals and INTERACTION for simultaneous PK/PD, impos sible?
Apr 15, 2005 Yaning Wang RE: Residuals and INTERACTION for simultaneous PK/PD,i mpos sible?
Apr 16, 2005 Nick Holford Re: Residuals and INTERACTION for simultaneous PK/PD,impossible?