RE: Negative values in 95%CI on ETAs

From: Rajanikanth Madabushi Date: November 16, 2004 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "MADABUSHI,RAJANIKANTH" Subject: RE: [NMusers] Negative values in 95%CI on ETAs Date: Tue, November 16, 2004 6:06 pm Hi Manoj, Since you say the data is rich and you are fixing Ka, you should be using FOCE. Moreover, FOCE is a better method of estimation than FO ("quick and dirty"). raj

Thread

View all 6 messages
Nov 16, 2004 Manoj Khurana Negative values in 95%CI on ETAs
Nov 16, 2004 Atul Bhattaram Venkatesh RE: Negative values in 95%CI on ETAs
Nov 16, 2004 Manoj Khurana RE: Negative values in 95%CI on ETAs
Nov 16, 2004 Sam Liao RE: Negative values in 95%CI on ETAs
Nov 16, 2004 Rajanikanth Madabushi RE: Negative values in 95%CI on ETAs
Nov 25, 2004 Nick Holford RE: Negative values in 95%CI on ETAs
← Previous
Next →