RE: covariates

From: Leonid Gibiansky Date: September 17, 2004 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From:"Leonid Gibiansky" leonidg@metrumrg.com Subject: RE: [NMusers] covariates Date: Fri, September 17, 2004 10:50 pm Nick, I think the range of disagreement even more narrow: the only point that I'd like to add to your allometric-scale CL and V representations is that we need to check whether random effects of the resulting model are independent of WT. If they are, this is great, it would be another confirmation of the general law. If, for some particular drug, random effects depend on WT even after the allometric scaling, it needs to be corrected either by changing the power x of the dependencies (CL~ WT^x,V~WT^x) or by addition of some other covariates that correlate with WT and can remove observed dependence of random effects on WT. Thanks for the references, Leonid
Sep 15, 2004 Renee Ying Hong covariates
Sep 15, 2004 Nick Holford RE: covariates
Sep 16, 2004 Renee Ying Hong RE: covariates
Sep 16, 2004 Nick Holford RE: covariates
Sep 16, 2004 Immanuel Freedman RE: covariates
Sep 16, 2004 Leonid Gibiansky RE: covariates
Sep 16, 2004 Nick Holford RE: covariates
Sep 16, 2004 Nick Holford RE: covariates
Sep 17, 2004 Leonid Gibiansky RE: covariates
Sep 17, 2004 Nick Holford RE: covariates
Sep 17, 2004 Ying Hong RE: covariates
Sep 17, 2004 Leonid Gibiansky RE: covariates
Sep 17, 2004 Nick Holford RE: covariates
Sep 17, 2004 Leonid Gibiansky RE: covariates
Sep 18, 2004 Nick Holford RE: covariates
Sep 20, 2004 Renee Ying Hong RE: covariates
Sep 20, 2004 Leonid Gibiansky RE: covariates
Sep 20, 2004 Nick Holford RE: covariates