Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC

From: Robert L. James Date: October 23, 2003 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: Robert L. James rjames@rhoworld.com Subject: Re: [NMusers] LLR test, AIC, BIC Date: 10/23/2003 9:00 AM David, I regularly use BIC (along with graphic examination, convergence of standard errors, and physiological intuition) as a criterium in model development. I prefer BIC because it is more parsimonious than AIC. I always try to error on the side of a simpler model. For NPAR I use all parameters estimated by the model (thetas,etas,sigmas). For NOBS I use the number of concentration-time points. Robert _______________________________________________________
Oct 21, 2003 David Foster LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 21, 2003 Nick Holford Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 21, 2003 Paul Hutson Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 22, 2003 Leonid Gibiansky Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 22, 2003 Matt Hutmacher Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 22, 2003 Nick Holford Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 22, 2003 Nick Holford Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 23, 2003 David Foster Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 23, 2003 Kenneth Kowalski Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 23, 2003 Peter Bonate Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 23, 2003 Robert L. James Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC