Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC

From: Peter Bonate Date: October 23, 2003 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: "Bonate, Peter" pbonate@ilexonc.com Subject: Re: [NMusers] LLR test, AIC, BIC Date: 10/23/2003 8:43 AM David, I don't know if you ever got anybody to answer you. But The AIC was originally predicated on independent observations, like in linear regression. I am not sure if it was ever really validated for repeated measures data, but people do it all the time. NOBS is total number of observations. NPAR is the number of estimable parameters, all thetas, etas, and sigmas, including covariances. BIC tends to pick the simpler model more often than AIC or AICc. The AICc was for small sample sizes and I don't believe really applies to pop pk models. NOBS is usually much larger than NPAR, so the second-order correction term is practically zero. An excellent book on this is Model Selection and Inference by Burnham and Anderson. This is a must read. Hope this helps, pete bonate
Oct 21, 2003 David Foster LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 21, 2003 Nick Holford Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 21, 2003 Paul Hutson Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 22, 2003 Leonid Gibiansky Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 22, 2003 Matt Hutmacher Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 22, 2003 Nick Holford Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 22, 2003 Nick Holford Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 23, 2003 David Foster Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 23, 2003 Kenneth Kowalski Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 23, 2003 Peter Bonate Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC
Oct 23, 2003 Robert L. James Re: LLR test, AIC, BIC