Re: Standard error of 'secondary' parameters

From: Lewis B. Sheiner Date: November 12, 1999 technical Source: cognigencorp.com
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 10:47:15 -0800 From: LSheiner <lewis@c255.ucsf.edu> Subject: Re: Standard error of 'secondary' parameters Not quite. Note that in (1) Cl = theta(1)+eta(1 (2) s = theta(2) (3) V = .693*Cl/s+eta(2) V now involves 2 etas, one explicit (eta(2)) in line (3), and the other via Cl (1) in the numerator of the RHS of (3). The following might be identical to the original (I'm not sure; as I said, this stuff is tricky): Cl = theta(1)+eta(1 s = theta(2) V = .693*theta(1)/s+eta(2) LBS. -- Lewis B Sheiner, MD Professor: Lab. Med., Biopharm. Sci., Med. Box 0626 voice: 415 476 1965 UCSF, SF, CA fax: 415 476 2796 94143-0626 email: lewis@c255.ucsf.edu

Thread

View all 11 messages
Nov 12, 1999 Lars Erichsen Computing std for secondary parms
Nov 12, 1999 Lewis B. Sheiner Re: Computing std for secondary parms
Nov 12, 1999 Nick Holford Re: Standard error of 'secondary' parameters
Nov 12, 1999 Lewis B. Sheiner Re: Standard error of 'secondary' parameters
Nov 12, 1999 Nick Holford Re: Standard error of 'secondary' parameters
Nov 12, 1999 Mark Sale RE: Standard error of 'secondary' parameters
Nov 12, 1999 Lewis B. Sheiner Re: Standard error of 'secondary' parameters
Nov 13, 1999 Mats Karlsson Re: Standard error of 'secondary' parameters
Nov 15, 1999 Chuanpu Hu Re: Standard error of 'secondary' parameters
Nov 15, 1999 Mark Sale RE: Standard error of 'secondary' parameters
Nov 17, 1999 Chuanpu Hu Re: Standard error of 'secondary' parameters
← Previous
Next →