Re[2]: Covariate Models

From: Unknown Date: Unknown date technical Source: cognigencorp.com
From: KGKOWA@monsanto.com Fri, 13 Jun 1997 08:29:45 -0500 Subject: Re[2]: Covariate Models Rik, I agree. I was trying to say the same thing but you've said it more elegantly. One may prefer one parameterization over another for 'computational' (numerical) not 'statistical' reasons as they are essentially fitting the same model. In Raj's example, I believe you meant that the value of THETA(1) is different between the two parameterizations (method 1 vs method 2) not THETA(2). Specifically, THETA(1) for the first parameterization corresponds to THETA(1) * (1/70)**THETA(2) for the second parameterization. The value (and interpretation) of THETA(2) does not change between these two parameterizations. Ken Kowalski G.D. Searle

Thread

View all 13 messages
Jun 11, 1997 Ralf Brueckner covariate models
Jun 11, 1997 Rene Braeckman Re: covariate models
Jun 11, 1997 Ferrin Harrison Re: covariate models
Jun 12, 1997 Pradhanr Re: covariate models
Jun 12, 1997 Ferdinand Rombout Antwort: RE: COVARIATE MODELS
Jun 12, 1997 Ralf Brueckner Covariate Models
Jun 12, 1997 Rene Braeckman Re[2]: covariate models
Jun 13, 1997 Vladimir Piotrovskij Gender as a covariate
Jun 13, 1997 Rik Schoemaker Re: Covariate Models
Jun 13, 1997 Rik Schoemaker Re: Re[2]: Covariate Models
Jun 13, 1997 Ferrin Harrison interpretable models
Jun 14, 1997 Ene Ette Re: Gender as a covariate
? Unknown Re[2]: Covariate Models
← Previous
Next →