All,
SIZES.f90 contains the parameter "PNM_MAXNODES" with the default of 100 nodes.
Have others encountered problems increasing this number and recompiling? It's
not clear that this is an issue, but it would be extremely useful to hear that
someone else in the community has successfully used >100 node parallelization.
! MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PARALLELIZATION NODES
PARAMETER (PNM_MAXNODES=100)
Regards,
Mike
NONMEM 7.2 maximum parallelization nodes
Dear nmusers:
I notice from our programming group (Nous InfoSystems) reveals no difficulties
regarding changing PNM_MAXNODES.
Robert J. Bauer, Ph.D.
Vice President, Pharmacometrics, R&D
ICON Development Solutions
7740 Milestone Parkway
Suite 150
Hanover, MD 21076
Tel: (215) 616-6428
Mob: (925) 286-0769
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://www.iconplc.com/
Quoted reply history
________________________________
From: Manjunatha Shivaiah (BLR GSS) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 7:03 AM
To: Bauer, Robert
Subject: FW: NONMEM 7.2 maximum parallelization nodes
Dear Bob,
We have compiled the latest nonmem7.3 source code by defining PNM_MAXNODES=110
on Linux platform using Intel compiler. There is no issue with compilation.
We have also executed testseries11\control test case with 110 nodes across the
system on Linux platform using MPI. It executed without any issue.
May be you want to communicate the same to nmusers group.
Best regards,
Manju
P Print this email only if unavoidable!!
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Dodds, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 10:03 PM
To: nmusers
Subject: [NMusers] NONMEM 7.2 maximum parallelization nodes
All,
SIZES.f90 contains the parameter "PNM_MAXNODES" with the default of 100 nodes.
Have others encountered problems increasing this number and recompiling? It's
not clear that this is an issue, but it would be extremely useful to hear that
someone else in the community has successfully used >100 node parallelization.
! MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PARALLELIZATION NODES
PARAMETER (PNM_MAXNODES=100)
Regards,
Mike
Dear Bob,
Thank you for the response, and I'll pass this along to our internal team.
Warm Regards,
Mike Dodds
Quoted reply history
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Bauer, Robert
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 9:53 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Manjunatha Shivaiah (BLR GSS)
Subject: [NMusers] FW: NONMEM 7.2 maximum parallelization nodes
Dear nmusers:
I notice from our programming group (Nous InfoSystems) reveals no difficulties
regarding changing PNM_MAXNODES.
Robert J. Bauer, Ph.D.
Vice President, Pharmacometrics, R&D
ICON Development Solutions
7740 Milestone Parkway
Suite 150
Hanover, MD 21076
Tel: (215) 616-6428
Mob: (925) 286-0769
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://www.iconplc.com/
________________________________
From: Manjunatha Shivaiah (BLR GSS) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 7:03 AM
To: Bauer, Robert
Subject: FW: NONMEM 7.2 maximum parallelization nodes
Dear Bob,
We have compiled the latest nonmem7.3 source code by defining PNM_MAXNODES=110
on Linux platform using Intel compiler. There is no issue with compilation.
We have also executed testseries11\control test case with 110 nodes across the
system on Linux platform using MPI. It executed without any issue.
May be you want to communicate the same to nmusers group.
Best regards,
Manju
P Print this email only if unavoidable!!
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Dodds, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 10:03 PM
To: nmusers
Subject: [NMusers] NONMEM 7.2 maximum parallelization nodes
All,
SIZES.f90 contains the parameter "PNM_MAXNODES" with the default of 100 nodes.
Have others encountered problems increasing this number and recompiling? It's
not clear that this is an issue, but it would be extremely useful to hear that
someone else in the community has successfully used >100 node parallelization.
! MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PARALLELIZATION NODES
PARAMETER (PNM_MAXNODES=100)
Regards,
Mike