Metabolite kinetics help

3 messages 3 people Latest: Jul 02, 2002

Metabolite kinetics help

From: Peter Bonate Date: June 28, 2002 technical
From:"Bonate, Peter" Subject:[NMusers] Metabolite kinetics help Date:Fri, 28 Jun 2002 09:27:51 -0500 I was wondering if I could solicit some help from the group. I'm trying to model parent and metabolite kinetics. Parent consists of 2-compartments and metabolite consists of 1-compartment. The starting values for parent are based on ADVAN3 results. The starting values for metabolite parameters were based on trial and error within SAAM II to give reasonable observed metabolite concentrations. Sigma is large due to some previous errors where it was suggested to raise the starting value of sigma. Here is my control stream: $PROBLEM ADVAN9 P+M $DATA PMCOV.DAT IGNORE=C $INPUT PTID=ID CYCL DAY HR TIME DV DOSE AMT RATE EVID MDV LYM WBC HO CMT TYPE L2=DROP AP HGB HCT NEUT PLAT=DROP RACE=DROP AGE=DROP $SUBR ADVAN9 TRANS1 TOL=4 $MODEL NCOMP=3 COMP=(CENTRAL) COMP=(PERIP) COMP=(M) $PK CL = THETA(1)*EXP(ETA(1)) V1 = THETA(2)*EXP(ETA(2)) Q = THETA(3) V2 = THETA(4) FM = THETA(5) KELM = THETA(6) S1 = V1/1000 S3 = 1 $ERROR IPRD = F IF (CMT .EQ. 1) THEN Y = F*EXP(EPS(1)) + EPS(2) ELSE Y = F*EXP(EPS(3)) + EPS(4) ENDIF $THETA (0, 41.1, 600); THETA(1) CL (0, 90.8, 1500); THETA(2) Vc (0, 70.1, 1000); THETA(3) CL (0, 232, 1500); THETA(4) Vp (0, 0.001, 1); THETA(5) FM (0, 0.2, 1); THETA(6) KELM $DES DADT(1) = -(CL + Q)*A(1)/V1 + Q/V2*A(2) DADT(2) = Q/V1*A(1) - Q/V2*A(2) DADT(3) = FM*CL/V1*A(1) - KELM*A(3) $OMEGA 0.267 $OMEGA 0.211 $SIGMA 5 0.00001 FIXED $SIGMA 5 0.00001 FIXED $COV $EST MAXEVAL=9999 SIGDIGITS=4 NOABORT METHOD=CONDITIONAL INTERACTION POSTHOC I keep getting this error message: 0PRED EXIT CODE = 1 0INDIVIDUAL NO. 2 ID=0.20000000E+01 (WITHIN-INDIVIDUAL) DATA REC NO. 3 THETA= 4.11E+01 9.08E+01 7.01E+01 2.32E+02 1.00E-03 2.00E-01 OCCURS DURING SEARCH FOR ETA AT A NONZERO VALUE OF ETA ERROR IN LSODI1: CODE 205 0END OF MESSAGES Here is the data for individual 2. I've ripped out the covariate columns PTID CYCLE DAY HR TIME DV DOSE AMT RATE EVID MDV CMT TYPE 2 1 1 0 0 . 27 27 27 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 27 . . 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 83.6 27 . . 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 4512 27 . . 0 0 3 2 2 1 1 2 2 37.1 27 . . 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 5327.5 27 . . 0 0 3 2 2 1 1 3 3 23.4 27 . . 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 3 3 5979.8 27 . . 0 0 3 2 2 1 1 4 4 0 27 . . 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 4 4 5599.3 27 . . 0 0 3 2 2 1 1 5 5 10.6 27 . . 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 5 5 5599.3 27 . . 0 0 3 2 2 1 1 24 24 3479.2 27 . . 0 0 3 2 2 1 2 0 24 . 27 27 27 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 0 24 0 27 . . 0 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 25 147.5 27 . . 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 1 25 8426.1 27 . . 0 0 3 2 2 1 3 0 48 . 27 27 27 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 0 72 . 27 27 27 1 1 1 1 2 1 5 0 96 . 27 27 27 1 1 1 1 Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong and what this error message means. Thanks ALOT! pete Peter L. Bonate, PhD Director, Pharmacokinetics ILEX Oncology, Inc 4545 Horizon Hill Blvd San Antonio, TX 78229 phone: 210-949-8662 fax: 210-949-8487 email: pbonate@ilexonc.com

RE: Metabolite kinetics help

From: Sam Liao Date: July 01, 2002 technical
From:"Sam Liao" Subject:RE: [NMusers] Metabolite kinetics help Date:Mon, 1 Jul 2002 17:34:21 -0400 Hi Peter: When I tried this model in simulation mode, the metabolite concentrations predicted were in the order of 10E-4, There could be some problems in your model specification causing the ERROR IN LSODI1. If the metabolite has the same concentration unit as the parent drug, S3 should be like this S1 = V1/1000 S3 = 1/1000 Also check the FM initial estimate. The initial estimates of EPS(1) and EPS(2) seems to be too large. However, this may not be the cause of ERROR IN LSODI1. Best regards, Sam Liao, Ph.D. PharMax Research 270 Kerry Lane, Blue Bell, PA 19422 phone: 215-6541151 efax: 1-720-2946783

Re: Metabolite kinetics help

From: Alan Xiao Date: July 02, 2002 technical
From:Alan Xiao Subject:Re: [NMusers] Metabolite kinetics help Date:Mon, 01 Jul 2002 20:59:16 -0400 Peter, I do not know what this error message means. But the following suggestion might help if you have not tried them yet: 1). increase the initial FM values at least to the order of the magnitude of 0.1 (Sam's simulation might mean this); and/or 2). move the term EXP(ETA(2)) from V2 to FM; Good luck. Alan. -- ***** Alan Xiao, Ph.D *************** ***** PK/PD Scientist *************** ***** Cognigen Corporation ********** ***** Tel: 716-633-3463 ext 265 ******