2-compartment model: V2 doesn't vary

4 messages 4 people Latest: Oct 01, 2001

2-compartment model: V2 doesn't vary

From: Stefan Wilde Date: September 28, 2001 technical
From: "Stefan Wilde" <stefanwilde@hotmail.com> Subject: 2-compartment model: V2 doesn't vary Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:41:46 +0200 Dear nonmem users, I'm analysing a dataset in a sparse data situation: 30 subjects, 3 visits per subject, 3 samples per visit (1st: 5-200 min post infusion, 2nd sample 60 min. later, 3rd sample approx. 16h p.i.) 2 different drugs are studied, both of them known to follow 2-compartment kinetics. Analysing these data with NONMEM (NMTran, Advan3, Trans4) gives reasonable estimates for all kinetic parameters and for variability of all parameters but V2. The peripheral Vd doesn't vary beetwen subjects (Est. of eta = 1EXP-11). Even when fixing intercompartment clearance V2 doesn't vary. Estimating 2-compartment kinetics of the 2nd drug given (slightly different post-infusion times) the results are the same: no variability of V2. We are quite concerned about these findigs that don't sound reasonable to us. Any explanations or suggestions of how to solve this problem are appreciated. Below you find excerpts of the nonmem control stream and the dataset. Thanks in advance, Stefan Control stream excerpt: $INPUT ID CY TIME AMT RATE DV MDV EVID $SUBROUTINE ADVAN=ADVAN3 TRANS=TRANS4 $PK CALLFL=1 CL = THETA(1)*EXP(ETA(1)) V1 = THETA(2)*EXP(ETA(2)) Q = THETA(3)*EXP(ETA(3)) V2 = THETA(4)*EXP(ETA(4)) S1 = V1/1000 $ERROR Y = F*(1+ERR(1)) ;Multiplikatives Modell $THETA (0,1.3,10000) (0,30,10000) (0,.9,10000) (0,500,10000) $OMEGA DIAGONAL(4) .01 .1 .1 .01 $SIGMA .8 $ESTIMATION METHOD=COND NOABORT PRINT=5 MAXEVAL=9999 SIGDIGIT=7 Dataset excerpt: ID Cycle Time Amt Rate DV MDV EVID 3 1 0 50 3.33333 0 1 4 3 1 15 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 130 0 0 8.41 0 0 3 1 345 0 0 6.98 0 0 3 1 1195 0 0 3.88 0 0 3 2 0 50 2.5 0 1 4 3 2 20 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 150 0 0 8.1 0 0 3 2 990 0 0 4.02 0 0 3 3 0 50 0.625 0 1 4 3 3 80 0 0 0 1 0 3 3 95 0 0 12.3 0 0 3 3 405 0 0 6.59 0 0 3 3 1245 0 0 4.59 0 0 9 1 0 48 1.29729 0 1 4 9 1 37 0 0 0 1 0 9 1 41 0 0 222 0 0 9 1 165 0 0 6.89 0 0 9 1 1277 0 0 2.24 0 0 -- Stefan Wilde Institute of Pharmacology Clinical Pharmacology University of Cologne Germany

Re: 2-compartment model: V2 doesn't vary

From: Atul Bhattaram Venkatesh Date: September 28, 2001 technical
From: "bvatul" <bvatul@ufl.edu> Subject: Re: 2-compartment model: V2 doesn't vary Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:23:59 -0400 Hello Stefan A couple of things: In sparse situation this can happen. You can fix the eta to say about 30% and run your analysis. Check your parameter estimates (calculate half-life etc) and see if they make any meaning. Also I was wondering why you changed the default value of NSIG to 7. Can this make things difficult, I am not sure! Such a low value of eta might mean you might be either overparameterising or the data structure might be doing so!! You might want to try simpler models. Hope this helps Atul

Re: 2-compartment model: V2 doesn't vary

From: Joern Loetsch Date: September 28, 2001 technical
From: Joern.Loetsch@t-online.de (Joern Loetsch) Subject: Re: 2-compartment model: V2 doesn't vary Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 21:42:42 +0200 I wouldn't be concerned. The result tells you that the interindividuela variability in your is sufficiently accounted for when assigning ETAs to the other structural parameters. An IIV on V2 does not further improve your fit. Jorn _______________________________________________________ Jorn Lotsch, MD pharmazentrum frankfurt, Department of Clinical Pharmacology Johann Wolfgang Geothe-University Hospital Theodor-Stern-Kai 7 D-60590 Frankfurt Germany Phone: +49-69-6301-4589 Fax: +49-69-6301-7636

Re: 2-compartment model: V2 doesn't vary

From: Lewis B. Sheiner Date: October 01, 2001 technical
From: Lewis B Sheiner <lewis@c255.ucsf.edu> Subject: Re: 2-compartment model: V2 doesn't vary Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 07:02:06 -0700 This has been discussed many times on nmusers - see archive. Basically, it is impossible to distinguish multiple components of variance when data are sparse. Maximum Likelihood (not NONMEM) prefers to drive certain variances to zero if they are unidentifiable. This is a peculiarity of ML. It does not mean that there is no variability in V2; it simply means that variability on V1, CL, etc., is adequate to explain the variability in the data. If you are using FO, it may be possible to estimate additional variance components by using FOCE, but that is inevitable. LBS.