RE: NONMEM and Bioavailability fraction

From: Cheng Chang Date: March 11, 2025 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Not the same issue, but issues of a similar nature. Most of the time, it is due to a discrepancy between the model structure and the dataset. Among ChatGPT's suggestions below, and I would bet on #1 (relative F between the two formulations not defined correctly): 1. Bioavailability Fraction Parameter: Ensure that the bioavailability fraction (F) parameter is correctly defined in the $PK record. A negative value might indicate an issue with how the parameter is calculated or defined in the model. 2. Dataset Errors: Verify that your dataset is correctly formatted. Non-numeric cells, NA values, and unsorted time columns can cause errors in NONMEM. Ensure that all cells in the dataset are numeric and properly formatted. 3. Additional Parameters: Check the additional parameters in your model, such as absorption lag time, relative bioavailability fraction, rate parameter for zero-order input, duration parameter of that input, and scaling parameter. Incorrect specification or estimation of these parameters can lead to errors. Cheng
Quoted reply history
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Marie Rajerison Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2025 9:50 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [EXTERNAL] [NMusers] RE: NONMEM and Bioavailability fraction Dear NM users I am running an extravascular pop PK model with dual absorption and got the following message from NM: [cid:[email protected]] Has anyone experienced the same issue and how to fix it? Thank you in advance for your help Marie
Mar 11, 2025 Marie Rajerison NONMEM and Bioavailability fraction
Mar 11, 2025 Sébastien Bihorel Re: NONMEM and Bioavailability fraction
Mar 11, 2025 Rob ter Heine Re: NONMEM and Bioavailability fraction
Mar 11, 2025 Sam Liao Re: NONMEM and Bioavailability fraction
Mar 11, 2025 Cheng Chang RE: NONMEM and Bioavailability fraction