RE: $PRIOR with normal for OMEGA?

From: Magnus Åstrand Date: November 11, 2016 technical Source: cognigen.com
Hi To add on Martin’s suggestion, one item to think of when using theta for estimating the variances of eta is to use log scaled STD as your model parameter, so instead of THETA*ETA (with OMEGA fixed) use exp(THETA)*ETA. This way you would assume a log-normal prior for the standard deviation of ETA which is more reasonable. Moreover the log-normal is quite close to the gamma distribution which I believe is the (univariate) distribution of diagonal elements of the inverse Wishart. Kind Regards Magnus Åstrand Principal Clinical Pharmacometrician, Ph.D. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ AstraZeneca Innovative Medicines | Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology SE-431 83 Mölndal, Sweden T: +46 (0)31 776 23 41 Mob: +46 (0)708 467 667 magnus.astrand_at_astrazeneca.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
Quoted reply history
From: owner-nmusers_at_globomaxnm.com [mailto:owner-nmusers_at_globomaxnm.com] On Behalf Of Martin Bergstrand Sent: den 11 november 2016 08:32 To: Mark Sale <msale_at_nuventra.com> Cc: nmusers_at_globomaxnm.com Subject: Re: [NMusers] $PRIOR with normal for OMEGA? Hi Mark, Not sure about this but how about estimating THETAS scaling fix OMEGAs (e.g. CL = THETA(1)*EXP(THETA(2)*ETA(1)) ; $OMEGA 1 fix)? Then you can implement the prior in the same way for random effect parameters as you do for fixed effect parameters. Ps. Probably not be compatible with MU-parameterization. Best regards, Martin Bergstrand, Ph.D. Senior Consultant Pharmetheus AB +46(0)709 994 396<tel:+46709%C2%A0994%20396> martin.bergstrand_at_pharmetheus.com<mailto:martin.bergstrand_at_pharmetheus.com> http://www.pharmetheus.com/ +46(0)18 513 328<tel:+4618%20513%20328> U-A Science Park, Dag Hammarskjölds v. 52b 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden Skickat från min iPhone 11 nov. 2016 kl. 04:57 skrev Mark Sale <msale_at_nuventra.com<mailto:msale_at_nuventra.com>>: Is it possible to use a normal prior for OMEGA? The default is inverse Wishart, but I'd be interested in using Normal (insuring that it is positive definite) Any ideas? thanks Mark Sale M.D. Vice President, Modeling and Simulation Nuventra Pharma Sciences, Inc. 2525 Meridian Parkway, Suite 280 Durham, NC 27713 Phone (919)-973-0383 msale_at_nuventra.com<msale_at_kinetigen.com> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information in this transmittal (including attachments, if any) may be privileged and confidential and is intended only for the recipient(s) listed above. Any review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this transmittal, in any form, is prohibited except by or on behalf of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this transmittal in error, please notify me immediately by reply email and destroy all copies of the transmittal. ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice: This message is private and may contain confidential and proprietary information. If you have received this message in error, please notify us and remove it from your system and note that you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of the contents of this message is not permitted and may be unlawful.
Nov 11, 2016 Mark Sale $PRIOR with normal for OMEGA?
Nov 11, 2016 Andrew Gewitz Re: $PRIOR with normal for OMEGA?
Nov 11, 2016 Martin Bergstrand Re: $PRIOR with normal for OMEGA?
Nov 11, 2016 Mats Karlsson RE: $PRIOR with normal for OMEGA?
Nov 11, 2016 Jakob Ribbing Re: $PRIOR with normal for OMEGA?
Nov 11, 2016 Magnus Åstrand RE: $PRIOR with normal for OMEGA?
Nov 11, 2016 Magnus Åstrand RE: $PRIOR with normal for OMEGA?
Dec 13, 2016 Mike K Smith RE: $PRIOR with normal for OMEGA?