Re: WT as significant covariate on peripheral volume

From: Ayyappa Chaturvedula Date: August 12, 2012 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Sven, I tried that and although obj fun reduces by 10 points, theta estimate was very small for central volume and do not make any big difference with increased total body weight. Regards, Ayyappa Sent from my iPad
Quoted reply history
On Aug 12, 2012, at 2:46 AM, "Sven Mensing" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Ayyappa, did you try testing it on both volumnws at the same time? Would make more sense to me. Regards Sven Am 12.08.2012 um 01:20 schrieb Ayyappa Chaturvedula <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>: Dear users, I am finding weight as a covariate on peripheral volume and objective function is dropping more than on central volume in a two compartment model. I am not sure if this is meaningful, I appreciate your comments. Regards, Ayyappa
Aug 11, 2012 Ayyappa Chaturvedula WT as significant covariate on peripheral volume
Aug 12, 2012 Sven Mensing Re: WT as significant covariate on peripheral volume
Aug 12, 2012 Ayyappa Chaturvedula Re: WT as significant covariate on peripheral volume
Aug 12, 2012 Ahmed Abbas RE: WT as significant covariate on peripheral volume
Aug 12, 2012 Bill Denney Re: WT as significant covariate on peripheral volume