Problems with PD Modelling

From: Xin yi Date: February 11, 2011 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Hi all, I'm new to nonmem and would be grateful for some pointers and help. I'm trying to do a pk-pd sequential modelling. I have modelled the PK data but I've encountered problems with PD. My PD model is a indirect inhibition response model. I have tried to change my initial estimates reduce the number of parameters in the model, but nothing seem to get me a good convergence. At different times, NONMEM gives me different error messages such as "parameter estimates near its boundary", "Minimisation successful. However problems occured with the minimization"(blank entries for omega or sigma estimates in the results file) *** or the "r matrix is algorithmically singular and non-positive definite". I have a few questions: 1) Are there any errors in the way I input my control and data file? 2) Under $ERROR in the control file, did I define it correctly with EFF=A(4), Y**=EFF+EFF*ERR(1)+ERR(2)*? Or should it be IPRED=F, Y=F+F*ERR(1)+ERR(2). 3) Why are they no estimates for sigma and omega in the results file? I have been constantly changing my initial estimates for omega and sigma but they always give me nil results. I appreciate any help on this matter. Thanks! Regards, X.Y. Ng * This is an example of my control file: $PROB RUN# pd_3_advan6 $INPUT ID TIME DV AMT CMT ADDL II MDV V2I V3I QI CLI KAI $DATA FINAL2.2.CSV IGNORE=C $SUBROUTINES ADVAN6 TRANS1 TOL=3 $MODEL COMP=DEPOT COMP=CENTRAL COMP=PERIPH COMP=EFFECT ;$MODEL defines the no of compartments in the model $PK V2=V2I V3=V3I Q=QI CL=CLI KA=KAI S2=V2 S3=V3 KIN=THETA(1)*EXP(ETA(1)) KOUT=THETA(2)*EXP(ETA(2)) IC50=THETA(3)*EXP(ETA(3)) F4=KIN/KOUT $DES DADT(1)=-KA*A(1) DADT(2)=KA*A(1)-Q/V2*A(2)+Q/V3*A(3)-CL/V2*A(2) DADT(3)=-Q/V3*A(3)+Q/V2*A(2) INH =A(2)/(IC50+A(2)) DADT(4)=KIN*(1-INH)-KOUT*A(4) $ERROR CP2=A(2)/S2 CP3=A(3)/S3 ;IPRED=F EFF=A(4) Y=EFF+EFF*ERR(1)+ERR(2) $THETA (0,0.281) ;POPKin $THETA (0,0.003) ;POPkout $THETA (0,2) ;POPIC50 $OMEGA 0.003 ;BSV Kin $OMEGA 0.003 ;BSV Kout $OMEGA 0.003 ;BSV IC50 $SIGMA 0.01 ;ERRCCV $SIGMA 0.0015 ;ERRADD $ESTIMATION METHOD=1 INTERACTION NOABORT MAXEVAL=9990 PRINT=10 POSTHOC $COVARIANCE $TABLE ID TIME DV AMT CMT NOPRINT ONEHEADER FILE=pd_3_advan6.TAB and an example of my data: * CID TIME DV AMT CMT ADDL II MDV V2I V3I QI CLI KAI 101 0 0 100 1 2 8 1 44.55 11.78 1.07 3.37 0.62 101 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 44.55 11.78 1.07 3.37 0.62 101 3 243 0 4 0 0 0 44.55 11.78 1.07 3.37 0.62 101 7 293 0 4 0 0 0 44.55 11.78 1.07 3.37 0.62 101 11 261 0 4 0 0 0 44.55 11.78 1.07 3.37 0.62 101 15 260 0 4 0 0 0 44.55 11.78 1.07 3.37 0.62 101 19 277 0 4 0 0 0 44.55 11.78 1.07 3.37 0.62 101 23 290 0 4 0 0 0 44.55 11.78 1.07 3.37 0.62 101 35 233 0 4 0 0 0 44.55 11.78 1.07 3.37 0.62 101 39 271 0 4 0 0 0 44.55 11.78 1.07 3.37 0.62 101 43 274 0 4 0 0 0 44.55 11.78 1.07 3.37 0.62 101 47 276 0 4 0 0 0 44.55 11.78 1.07 3.37 0.62 * *
Feb 11, 2011 Xin yi Problems with PD Modelling
Feb 11, 2011 Hong Lu Re: Problems with PD Modelling
Feb 12, 2011 Xin yi Re: Problems with PD Modelling
Feb 12, 2011 Leonid Gibiansky Re: Problems with PD Modelling
Feb 13, 2011 Xin yi Re: Problems with PD Modelling
Feb 13, 2011 Leonid Gibiansky Re: Problems with PD Modelling