RE: Negative OFV number

From: Serge Guzy Date: December 18, 2010 technical Source: mail-archive.com
For each observation (j)associated with an individual (i),you can calculate the contribution to the overall - log-likelihood (CLIKEIND(K,J))for any PK set of values (sampled from the current population PK distribution if using MCPEM). CONCNORM(K,J)=(DLOG(CONC(I,J))-DLOG(DABS(CPREDICTED(K,J))))/(SD) CLIKEIND(K,J) =dLOG(SD)+CONCNORM(K,J)**2.0d0/2.0d0 SD is the standard deviation associated with your error variance model. Dlog(SD) can be negative. CONC(I,J) is the observed concentration for individual I at its jth observation and Cpredicted(K,J) is the predicted concentration for that individual (I has been omitted) for the kth simulated Pk vector (MCPEM method). OFV can be negative for both log or not log transformed data. Serge Guzy President, CEO; POP_PHARM;INC.
Quoted reply history
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Yuhong Chen Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 1:19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [NMusers] Negative OFV number Dear All, I am reviewing a PopPK report, and found the OFV is negative. The model used the log transformed data. Is it can be the reason of negative OFV number? Is the negative OFV number means the model may have problem? Any suggestion will be greatly appreciated. Warm regards, Yuhong -- The information contained in this email message may contain confidential or legally privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the named recipient(s). No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any transmission error. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, please immediately delete the e-mail and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender either by telephone or return e-mail. Any direct or indirect use, disclosure, distribution, printing, or copying of any part of this message is prohibited. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the views of XOMA.
Dec 17, 2010 Yuhong Chen Negative OFV number
Dec 18, 2010 Serge Guzy RE: Negative OFV number
Dec 19, 2010 Kenneth Kowalski RE: Negative OFV number