Re: Meta-analysis with Nonmem

From: Guangli Ma Date: March 05, 2010 technical Source: mail-archive.com
Dear Dirk, Thanks. Now I understand that it is one observation per individual. The reason why I mentioned CFB is not to ask how to use it but to show if CFB can not be derived from simulation, there is no additional benefit. Your results hightly depend on N, because simulation introduces random errors for observed SD/SE. Best regards, Guangli

Thread

View all 14 messages
Feb 24, 2010 Alindauer-research Meta-analysis with Nonmem
Feb 24, 2010 Leonid Gibiansky Re: Meta-analysis with Nonmem
Feb 26, 2010 Alindauer-research Re: Meta-analysis with Nonmem
Feb 26, 2010 Leonid Gibiansky Re: Meta-analysis with Nonmem
Mar 03, 2010 Guangli Ma Re: Meta-analysis with Nonmem
Mar 04, 2010 Guangli Ma Re: Meta-analysis with Nonmem
Mar 04, 2010 Nick Holford Re: Meta-analysis with Nonmem
Mar 04, 2010 Elodie Plan RE: Meta-analysis with Nonmem
Mar 04, 2010 Alindauer-research RE: Meta-analysis with Nonmem
Mar 05, 2010 Marco Campioni RE: Meta-analysis with Nonmem
Mar 05, 2010 Guangli Ma Re: Meta-analysis with Nonmem
Mar 05, 2010 Martin Bergstrand RE: Meta-analysis with Nonmem
Mar 05, 2010 Marco . Campioni RE: Meta-analysis with Nonmem
Mar 08, 2010 Elodie Plan RE: Meta-analysis with Nonmem
← Previous
Next →