RE: Steady state model

From: Matt Fidler Date: August 06, 2009 technical Source: cognigen.com
Can't you just explain that r2 is not a good measurement for goodness of fit for these types of models? Matt.
Quoted reply history
________________________________ From: owner-nmusers On Behalf Of Mark Sale - Next Level Solutions Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:39 AM Cc: nmusers Subject: RE: [NMusers] Steady state model [cid:866303515 Does anyone have any reference for "typical" R^2 for pk/pd relationships. I have an analysis with an R^2 of 0.13 (highly significant), and the sponsor is unimpressed - thinking that an R^2 should be > 0.9 - apparently like it was in physics class. Mark Sale MD Next Level Solutions, LLC http://www.NextLevelSolns.com 919-846-9185 This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you. (image/png attachment: left.letterhead)
Aug 05, 2009 Sherwin K Sy Steady state model
Aug 05, 2009 Nick Holford Re: Steady state model
Aug 06, 2009 Avg RE: Steady state model
Aug 06, 2009 Mouksassi Mohamad-Samer RE: Steady state model
Aug 06, 2009 Avg RE: Steady state model
Aug 06, 2009 Mark Sale RE: Steady state model
Aug 06, 2009 Matt Fidler RE: Steady state model
Aug 06, 2009 Matt Fidler RE: Steady state model
Aug 06, 2009 Sherwin K Sy Re: Steady state model
Aug 06, 2009 Matt Hutmacher RE: Steady state model
Aug 07, 2009 Bill Gillespie Re: Steady state model